Safe Output Health Report - 2026-03-25 #22903
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Safe Output Health Monitor. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #23123. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Today was a clean run with no safe output failures. All safe output handler jobs completed successfully.
Safe Output Job Statistics
missing_datacreate_discussionadd_commentdispatch_workflowcreate_issueset_issue_typesend_slack_messageTotal: 8 messages across 3 workflow runs, 7 executed + 1 custom-handled. Zero failures.
Workflow Run Details
AI Moderator — run-23541649621
missing_datamissing_datawith context: "Moderation requires unsanitized title/body text, but the GitHub MCP response withheld the issue resource due to integrity policy." This is expected behavior — the safe output handler recorded the missing data correctly.Constraint Solving — Problem of the Day — run-23541908942
create_discussionCould not find label IDs for: constraint-solving, problem-of-the-day— labels not present in repository. Discussion was created and older one closed successfully; only labels were not applied. (Pattern EP_LABELS_MISSING — 2nd consecutive day)Smoke Copilot — run-23541922245
add_comment→ ✅ Comment posted to discussion Terminal Stylist: Console Output Analysis Report — gh-aw #22882dispatch_workflow→ ✅ Dispatched haiku-printer workflowcreate_discussion→ ✅ Created (older smoke-copilot discussion closed)create_issue→ ✅ Created issue Smoke Test: Copilot - 23541922245 #22900, sub-issue of new group Smoke Copilot - Issue Group #22901set_issue_type→ ✅ Set type to "Bug" on issue Smoke Test: Copilot - 23541922245 #22900send_slack_message→ ⏭️ Skipped (custom safe output job — logged in manifest)Error Clusters
No error clusters today. All safe output operations completed successfully.
Warnings
create_discussion→add_labelsstepconstraint-solving-potdworkflow frontmatter specifieslabels: ["constraint-solving", "problem-of-the-day"], but these labels have not been created in thegithub/gh-awrepository. The discussion is created successfully; only the label application step fails silently.Root Cause Analysis
Safe Output Job Skips (Out of Scope)
28+ runs had their safe_outputs jobs skipped because the detection job failed (
detection.result == 'failure'). This is expected behavior — the conditional gate prevents safe output execution when detection hasn't validated agent output. Affected workflows include Smoke Gemini, Auto-Triage Issues (x2), Smoke Update Cross-Repo PR, and Smoke Create Cross-Repo PR. These detection failures are handled by separate monitoring workflows and are out of scope for this audit.Recommendations
Non-Critical (Low Priority)
constraint-solvingandproblem-of-the-dayreferenced in frontmatter don't exist in repositorygh label create constraint-solving --color "#0075ca"andgh label create problem-of-the-day --color "#e4e669"ingithub/gh-awWork Item Plans
Work Item 1: Create Missing Labels for constraint-solving-potd
constraint-solvingandproblem-of-the-daylabels referenced in theconstraint-solving-potdworkflow do not exist in thegithub/gh-awrepository. This causes a non-fatal warning on every run of this daily workflow.constraint-solvingandproblem-of-the-daycreated ingithub/gh-awHistorical Context
Trends
Metrics and KPIs
send_slack_messagecorrectly skippedNext Steps
constraint-solvingandproblem-of-the-dayin repo (EP_LABELS_MISSING fix)References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions