You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The github/gh-aw project remains highly active as of 2026-04-11. Over the last 90 days, the team merged 70 pull requests with an impressive average merge time of only 1.4 hours, reflecting a fast-moving development cycle. Issue resolution is healthy with 895 issues closed out of 1,000 tracked (89.5% resolution rate), averaging 10.3 hours to close. Discussion engagement covers 100 recent discussions, though automated/bot discussions dominate the answer tracking.
The project is driven by a small core of 2 unique human contributors making direct PR contributions, with Copilot coding agent accounting for significant automation throughput.
Key Highlights
✅ 70 PRs merged in the last 90 days
📊 895 issues resolved (89.5% resolution rate)
💬 100 discussions active in the last 90 days
⏱️ Average PR merge time: 1.4 hours (excellent)
⏱️ Average issue close time: 10.3 hours
👥 2 unique human contributors on PRs
🚨 Critical Performance Issues
No critical performance issues detected. Merge velocity is excellent and issue resolution rate is strong.
The repository shows balanced activity across all three collaboration channels. Issues dominate at 1,000 tracked (the query limit), reflecting high community engagement. PRs (100 in window) and discussions (100 in window) are both active and healthy. The rapid PR merge time of 1.4 hours indicates streamlined CI/CD and review processes.
PR merge rate is strong: 70% of recent PRs have been merged, with only 3 remaining open (3%) and 27 closed without merge (27%), likely from draft/superseded branches. Issue closure rate at 89.5% is excellent for an active repository.
At 1.4 hours average merge time, the team is operating at top-tier velocity. Issue close time of 10.3 hours is also well within healthy ranges. The discussion answer rate appears low (0%) due to how automated workflow discussions are structured — most are informational reports rather than Q&A threads.
Monitor open issues: 105 open issues — prioritize triaging any that are older than 7 days to maintain the current excellent resolution rate.
Expand contributor base: With 2 unique human PR contributors, consider outreach or good first issue labeling to attract more community involvement.
Discussion engagement: Most discussions are automated reports; consider adding a dedicated Q&A category to encourage community questions and track answer rates separately from automated reports.
Report generated automatically by the Daily Performance Summary workflow Data source: github/gh-aw — Last 90 days ending 2026-04-11 Powered by MCP Script Tools — GitHub queries via safe-input MCP tools
References:
§24293904297 — Workflow run generating this report
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Performance Overview
The
github/gh-awproject remains highly active as of 2026-04-11. Over the last 90 days, the team merged 70 pull requests with an impressive average merge time of only 1.4 hours, reflecting a fast-moving development cycle. Issue resolution is healthy with 895 issues closed out of 1,000 tracked (89.5% resolution rate), averaging 10.3 hours to close. Discussion engagement covers 100 recent discussions, though automated/bot discussions dominate the answer tracking.The project is driven by a small core of 2 unique human contributors making direct PR contributions, with Copilot coding agent accounting for significant automation throughput.
Key Highlights
🚨 Critical Performance Issues
No critical performance issues detected. Merge velocity is excellent and issue resolution rate is strong.
📈 Activity Overview
📎 Chart: Activity Overview — available in the workflow run artifacts
The repository shows balanced activity across all three collaboration channels. Issues dominate at 1,000 tracked (the query limit), reflecting high community engagement. PRs (100 in window) and discussions (100 in window) are both active and healthy. The rapid PR merge time of 1.4 hours indicates streamlined CI/CD and review processes.
📊 Detailed Benchmark Results
🎯 Resolution Metrics
📎 Chart: Resolution Metrics — available in the workflow run artifacts
PR merge rate is strong: 70% of recent PRs have been merged, with only 3 remaining open (3%) and 27 closed without merge (27%), likely from draft/superseded branches. Issue closure rate at 89.5% is excellent for an active repository.
⚡ Velocity Metrics
📎 Chart: Velocity Metrics — available in the workflow run artifacts
At 1.4 hours average merge time, the team is operating at top-tier velocity. Issue close time of 10.3 hours is also well within healthy ranges. The discussion answer rate appears low (0%) due to how automated workflow discussions are structured — most are informational reports rather than Q&A threads.
📊 Complete Performance Data
Pull Requests (Last 90 Days)
Issues (Last 90 Days)
Discussions (Last 90 Days)
📈 Historical Comparisons
Previous daily performance report: 2026-04-10 | 2026-04-09
💡 Optimization Recommendations
good first issuelabeling to attract more community involvement.Report generated automatically by the Daily Performance Summary workflow
Data source: github/gh-aw — Last 90 days ending 2026-04-11
Powered by MCP Script Tools — GitHub queries via safe-input MCP tools
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions