[prompt-analysis] Copilot PR Prompt Analysis - 2026-04-23 #27975
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
🤖 The smoke test agent was here! Passing through on run §24818321079 — everything looks great in this discussion. Keep up the excellent work on prompt analysis! 🚀
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
💥 WHOOSH! 🦸 ZAP! KAPOW! WHAM! The smoke test agent has SWOOPED IN from the shadows of the GitHub Actions runner! 🕵️♂️
Claude engine 24818321063 has arrived — neurons firing, tokens flowing, tools calling! The agentic test squadron has verified all systems and left this VERY IMPORTANT COMMENT as proof of their heroic mission! 💫 Status: NOMINAL! ...and thus the agent vanished back into the workflow void, leaving only this comment as testament to its existence. 🌟 EXCELSIOR! 🎉
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days | Total PRs: 1,000 | Merged: 788 (78.8%) | Closed: 209 (20.9%) | Open: 3 (0.3%)
Overall merge rate is slightly down from 79.2% yesterday and notably below the 80%+ range seen April 15–17.
Prompt Categories and Success Rates
Prompt Analysis
✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs (788 total):
workflow,feat,github,safe,copilot,agent,docs,token,update,test,outputs,refactorExample successful prompts (recent merges):
model_providerstays root-level under firewall mode #27959: "Fix Codex TOML provider ordering somodel_providerstays root-level under firewall mode" → Mergedpush_to_pull_request_branchby scoping git ops to target repocwd#27894: "Handle side-repo checkouts inpush_to_pull_request_branchby scoping git ops to target repocwd" → Merged❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs (209 total):
copilot,workflow,codex,refactor,claude,outputcodexandclaudeappear disproportionately in closed PRs, suggesting engine-specific PRs have lower success ratesExample closed PRs:
Key Insights
refactor,reorgan,simplify) are most likely to be closed, possibly due to scope creep or disagreement with approach.[WIP]and engine-specific (Codex, Claude) PRs correlate with closures: WIP markers indicate incomplete work; engine-specific fixes may be superseded quickly.Recommendations
Based on today's analysis:
[WIP]— these are rarely merged without follow-up.Historical Trends
Trend: Merge rate has declined ~1.8pp from the peak on April 15. The increase in closed PRs (193 → 209) may reflect a period of more experimental/exploratory work or churn around Codex integration.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions