[prompt-analysis] Copilot PR Prompt Analysis - 2026-04-25 #28399
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot PR Prompt Pattern Analysis. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #28551. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days | Total PRs: 1,000 | Merged: 780 (78.1%) | Closed: 218 (21.8%) | Open: 2 (0.2%)
Overall merge rate is strong at 78.1%, a slight drop from yesterday's 78.1% (vs 78.8% on 2026-04-23 and 80.2% on 2026-04-17).
Prompt Categories and Success Rates
Prompt Analysis
✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs:
workflow,github,changes,agent,workflows,safe,copilot,actions,added,test,step,engine,file,output,setupExample merged PRs:
❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs:
workflow,github,copilot,workflows,changes,agent,lock,make,codex,safe,actions,validation,step,issue,update[WIP]prefix strongly correlates with closurecodexandlockfiles appear more often in closed PRs (potential compilation/recompile failures)Example closed PRs:
Key Insights
[WIP]= risk signal: PRs with[WIP]in the title are disproportionately represented in closed PRs. Prompts that produce exploratory or incomplete work tend to be abandoned.Recommendations
fix: <symptom> in <module>.[WIP]or asking Copilot to "explore and figure out a plan" — these produce tentative PRs that are usually closed.Historical Trends (Last 7 Days)
Trend: Merge rate has declined ~2 percentage points over the past week (80.2% → 78.1%). The increase in closed PRs may reflect more exploratory/WIP Copilot usage or harder tasks being attempted.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions