Agent Performance Report — Week of 2026-05-10 #31343
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-05-11T13:06:57.883Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Performance Rankings
Top Performing Agents 🏆
Agentic Maintenance (Quality: 90/100, Effectiveness: 92/100)
Issue Monster (Quality: 85/100, Effectiveness: 87/100)
@playwright/clifrom 0.1.11 to 0.1.13 #30982, 🔍 Multi-Device Docs Testing Report - 2026-05-08 #30954)Auto-Close Parent Issues (Quality: 82/100, Effectiveness: 85/100)
Bot Detection (Quality: 80/100, Effectiveness: 80/100)
PR Triage Agent (Quality: 80/100, Effectiveness: 80/100)
Agents Needing Improvement 📉
PR-review cluster — Q, Scout, Archie, cloclo, Grumpy, Security Review, PR Nitpick, PR Code Quality (Effectiveness: ~0/100)
under-creation+inconsistencyaction_required)Plan Command (Quality: ~40/100, Effectiveness: ~30/100)
over-creation+repetition[plan]issues before creating; implement rate-limit or batch guard in promptDaily Fact About gh-aw (Effectiveness: 0/100)
under-creation+inconsistencySmoke Gemini (Effectiveness: 0/100)
under-creationDeployment Incident Monitor (Effectiveness: 0/100)
under-creation(zombie)Recovering Agents 📈
Inactive / Structural Failures
web-fetchMCP tool; structural config gapaction_requiredon 10 consecutive runs)Behavioral Pattern Analysis
Pattern Distribution (19 profiled agents)
under-creationinconsistencyscope-creepover-creationrepetitionDominant Concern: Under-Creation (42%)
8 agents are running but failing to produce outputs. This is the primary driver of the depressed health score (61/100). The PR-review cluster alone accounts for 34 wasted runs per day.
Secondary Concern: Inconsistency (37%)
Scheduled agents (
Dev,Stale PR Cleanup,Weekly Editors Health Check) showing run-to-run variance on fixed-cadence tasks. This suggests external dependency fragility (API timeouts, token expiry) rather than prompt issues.Scope Creep (Improving)
Both AI Moderator and Content Moderation showed scope-creep on PR diff events. Both are actively recovering — the pattern has been addressed and success rates are improving.
Collaboration Patterns
action_requiredloopsQuality & Effectiveness Analysis
Quality Distribution (profiled agents)
Note: Agents with 0% success rate score in the Poor band by default.
Common Quality Issues
Resource Efficiency
Coverage Analysis
Well-Covered Areas ✅
Coverage Gaps⚠️
Redundancy
Recommendations
High Priority 🔴
Fix PR-review cluster trigger gate — Add a shared pre-check step across all 8 agents to validate PR state before running; or consolidate into 2–3 focused agents
Plan Command deduplication — Add open-issue check before creating
[plan]issues; implement idempotency guardSmoke Gemini fresh investigation — [aw-failures] P0: Smoke CI agent crashes — Crush EROFS install failure & Gemini API key invalid #29666 / [deep-report] Fix Gemini smoke engine (broken 30+ consecutive days) #30175 fix was ineffective; escalate to infrastructure team or deprecate the Gemini smoke workflow
Medium Priority 🟡
noopfallback to ensure safe-output tool is always calledLow Priority 🟢
web-fetchto Codex engine configurationTrends
The quality and effectiveness plateau at 74/71 indicates the ecosystem has reached a local stability equilibrium — the healthy agents are performing well but the broken agents (particularly Smoke Gemini and the PR-review cluster) are preventing further improvement. Breaking the plateau requires resolving at least one P0 issue.
Actions Taken This Run
pattern-detectorclassified 19 agentsagent-performance-latest.mdNext Steps
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions