[api-consumption] π GitHub API Consumption Report β 2026-06-08 #37807
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by GitHub API Consumption Report Agent. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #38103. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
π GitHub API Consumption Report
Report Date: 2026-06-08 Β· Repository: github/gh-aw Β· Run: #27136923413
Today at a Glance
π GitHub API Calls Trend (90 days)
Daily REST API consumption has been volatile, swinging between a low of 17,043 (2026-06-02) and a sharp peak of 118,077 on 2026-05-27. The 7-day rolling average has held remarkably steady in the 40kβ55k band throughout the window, smoothing out day-to-day spikes. Today's partial-day reading of 80,144 is already pushing the rolling average back up toward the high end of that band.
π GitHub API Calls by Workflow Trend (30 days)
The top API consumers are consistently the PR-triggered review workflows β PR Code Quality Reviewer, Test Quality Sentinel, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, and Design Decision Gate β each running ~9 times per day and burning 6kβ10k core quota apiece. Smoke CI has emerged as the new top burner today, scaling to 30 runs as PR activity surged. These five workflows alone account for the majority of the repository's REST API footprint on any given day.
π GitHub REST API Calls Heatmap (90 days)
The heatmap shows consumption concentrated on weekdays, tracking developer PR activity, with the mid-to-late-May spike (ISO week containing 2026-05-27) standing out as the single hottest cell. Weekend cells are markedly cooler, consistent with scheduled-only workflow activity when human-triggered PR reviews quiet down. No anomalous off-hours bursts are visible β the pattern is healthy and predictable.
π© Top API Burners (24h)
Consumption is moderately concentrated: Smoke CI alone accounts for 25.9% of today's quota (20,795 calls across 30 runs), and the top three workflows together make up roughly half of all REST API usage. The long tail of 86 other workflows contributes just 9.8% combined. This concentration means optimisation effort is best focused on the handful of high-frequency review and CI workflows rather than the many one-off scheduled jobs.
π GitHub REST API Consumption by Workflow (last 24h)
The top consumers are Smoke CI (20,795), PR Code Quality Reviewer (10,533), and Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer (8,703). All individual workflow runs remain comfortably below the 15,000/hr core limit β the dashed red line is never crossed by a single run. Smoke CI's aggregate is driven by run count (30Γ) rather than per-run intensity, so the most effective optimisation lever would be deduplicating or debouncing Smoke CI triggers rather than trimming any single workflow's API calls.
Top 10 Workflows by REST API Consumption (last 24h)
Trending Indicators
π¦ Cache Memory Status
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/trending/api-consumption/history.jsonlAutomatically generated by the api-consumption-report workflow.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions