[geo-optimizer] GEO Audit Report — 2026-06-09 #38181

2026-06-09T17:17:33Z

github-actions[bot]
Bot Jun 9, 2026

GEO Audit Report — github/gh-aw

Audit Date: 2026-06-09
Run: §27222954570

📊 Scores

Target	Score	Band
Docs site (`github.github.com/gh-aw/`)	42/100	Foundation
README (`github.com/github/gh-aw`)	55/100	Foundation
Sitemap average (20/188 pages audited)	31.65/100	Critical

✅ Top Strengths

README robots.txt — 27 AI bots explicitly allowed (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, and more); score 15/18
README llms.txt — Present and well-structured: 2,919 words, 12 sections, 117 links; score 14/18
Docs site meta tags — Perfect score (14/14): title, description, canonical, all Open Graph tags present
Docs site schema JSON-LD — Good coverage (12/16): WebSite, Organization, SoftwareApplication, and FAQPage types present
Docs site freshness signals — Perfect score (6/6): lang, RSS feed, and dateModified all present
Docs site instruction readiness — 90/100 readiness, all buttons/inputs labeled, ARIA live regions present
AI bots not blocked — CDN/server returns 200 for GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and PerplexityBot on both targets

🚨 Critical Gaps

Docs site has no robots.txt (0/18) — AI crawlers can access the site, but the absence of an explicit Allow for AI bots is a missed authority signal. Recommendation: geo llms --base-url https://github.github.com/gh-aw
Docs site has no llms.txt (0/18) — Every page in the sitemap scored 0 here. Adding /llms.txt would lift the entire site.
AI Discovery endpoints missing on both targets (0/6 each) — /.well-known/ai.txt, /ai/summary.json, /ai/faq.json, and /ai/service.json are all absent.
README has no Schema JSON-LD (0/16) — GitHub repo pages lack structured data entirely; no WebSite, Organization, or FAQPage schema.
Sitemap-wide Critical band — 19 of 20 audited pages scored in the Critical band (≤33/100), driven almost entirely by the missing robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI discovery signals.
Brand & Entity weak on README (3/10) — Zero Knowledge Graph pillar links (no Wikipedia, Wikidata, LinkedIn, or Crunchbase); no sameAs in schema.
Negative signals on both — Hidden CSS text (medium risk prompt injection flag), keyword stuffing (github at 2.7% on docs site; issue at 22.5% on README), and 12 broken links on the README.

🔧 Recommended Fixes (Priority Order)

#	Action	Impact	Target
1	Add `robots.txt` with explicit `Allow` for AI bots to docs site	+18 pts on every page	Docs site
2	Add `/llms.txt` to docs site (`geo llms --base-url https://github.github.com/gh-aw`)	+18 pts on every page	Docs site
3	Add `/.well-known/ai.txt`, `/ai/summary.json`, `/ai/faq.json`, `/ai/service.json`	+6 pts on every page	Both
4	Add WebSite + Organization + FAQPage JSON-LD schema to README	+16 pts on README	README
5	Add `sameAs` KG pillar links to Organization schema (Wikipedia, Wikidata, LinkedIn, Crunchbase)	+4 pts on docs site	Docs site
6	Add `<link rel="canonical">` to README	+3 pts	README
7	Add RSS feed `<link rel="alternate">` to README `<head>`	+3 pts	README
8	Fix 12 broken links on README page	Removes negative signal	README
9	Diversify vocabulary on docs site (`github` keyword density 2.7%) and README (`issue` at 22.5%)	Removes -3 penalty	Both
10	Add concrete statistics and numbers to docs site content	+5 pts (content)	Docs site

📋 Full Breakdown by Category

Docs Site (`github.github.com/gh-aw/`) — 42/100 Foundation

Category	Score	Max	Notes
Robots.txt	0	18	File not found
llms.txt	0	18	File not found
Schema JSON-LD	12	16	WebSite, Organization, SoftwareApplication, FAQPage
Meta Tags	14	14	✅ Perfect
Content	7	12	926 words, no stats/numbers, no lists/tables
Signals	6	6	✅ Perfect — lang, RSS, freshness
AI Discovery	0	6	No /.well-known/ai.txt or /ai/*.json endpoints
Brand & Entity	6	10	KG pillars 2/4 (Wikidata ✅, LinkedIn ✅; Wikipedia ❌, Crunchbase ❌)
Negative penalty	-3	—	Hidden text (CtrlK), keyword stuffing (`github` 2.7%)

Trust Stack: Technical 3/5 · Identity 3/5 · Social 4/5 · Academic 1/5 · Consistency 4/5 — Grade C (medium)

Platform Citation Scores: ChatGPT 50 · Perplexity 65 · Google AI 80

Negative Signals: Hidden text (1 instance), keyword stuffing (github 2.7%); no broken links

WebMCP Readiness: Basic — has SearchAction potential action but no tool attributes or OpenAPI spec

README (`github.com/github/gh-aw`) — 55/100 Foundation

Category	Score	Max	Notes
Robots.txt	15	18	✅ 27 AI bots explicitly allowed; not explicit per-bot
llms.txt	14	18	✅ Present — 2,919 words, 12 sections, 117 links; no llms-full.txt
Schema JSON-LD	0	16	No structured data found on GitHub repo page
Meta Tags	11	14	No canonical URL; description only 98 chars
Content	12	12	✅ Perfect — 3,179 words, 43 headings, stats, lists/tables
Signals	3	6	Language present; no RSS; no freshness/dateModified
AI Discovery	0	6	No /.well-known/ai.txt or /ai/*.json endpoints
Brand & Entity	3	10	No KG pillar links; no sameAs in schema
Negative penalty	-3	—	Hidden text, popup signals, 12 broken links, keyword stuffing

Trust Stack: Technical 5/5 · Identity 3/5 · Social 1/5 · Academic 4/5 · Consistency 3/5 — Grade C (medium)

Platform Citation Scores: ChatGPT 55 · Perplexity 70 · Google AI 48

Content Decay Risk: HIGH (evergreen score 30/100) — 10 temporal/version decay signals detected; add dateModified schema

Negative Signals: Hidden nav text, popup signals, 12 broken links, keyword stuffing (issue at 22.5%)

📄 Sitemap Page Scores (20 of 188 audited)

Page	Score	Band
`/` (homepage)	42	Foundation
`/blog`	33	Critical
`/blog/3`, `/blog/4`, `/blog/8`	33 each	Critical
`/blog/2`, `/blog/5`, `/blog/6`	32 each	Critical
`/blog/7`, `/blog/9`	30–31	Critical
`/blog/2026-01-13-*` (7 posts)	30 each	Critical
`/agent-factory-status`	27	Critical

Pattern: Every page scores 0 on robots.txt, llms.txt, and AI discovery — these are site-wide infrastructure gaps. Fixing them once at the site level raises all 188 pages simultaneously.

Average score breakdown across 20 pages: Meta 14.0 · Signals 5.05 · Content 10.7 · Schema 0.6 · Brand 2.25 · robots 0.0 · llms 0.0 · AI discovery 0.0

References:

§27222954570

Automated audit powered by geo-optimizer-skill · Run logs

Generated by 🌍 GEO Optimizer Daily Audit · ⌖ 22.4 AIC · ⊞ 17.1K · ◷

expires on Jun 12, 2026, 9:17 AM UTC-08:00

2026-06-11T17:47:45Z

github-actions[bot]
Bot Jun 11, 2026
Author

This discussion has been marked as outdated by GEO Optimizer Daily Audit.

A newer discussion is available at Discussion #38685.

0 replies

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[geo-optimizer] GEO Audit Report — 2026-06-09 #38181

Uh oh!

{{title}}

Uh oh!

Docs Site (`github.github.com/gh-aw/`) — 42/100 Foundation

README (`github.com/github/gh-aw`) — 55/100 Foundation

Replies: 1 comment

Uh oh!

{{title}}

Uh oh!

Select a reply

Uh oh!

[geo-optimizer] GEO Audit Report — 2026-06-09 #38181

Uh oh!

github-actions[bot] Bot Jun 9, 2026

GEO Audit Report — github/gh-aw

📊 Scores

✅ Top Strengths

🚨 Critical Gaps

🔧 Recommended Fixes (Priority Order)

Docs Site (github.github.com/gh-aw/) — 42/100 Foundation

README (github.com/github/gh-aw) — 55/100 Foundation

Replies: 1 comment

Uh oh!

github-actions[bot] Bot Jun 11, 2026 Author

github-actions[bot]
Bot Jun 9, 2026

Docs Site (`github.github.com/gh-aw/`) — 42/100 Foundation

README (`github.com/github/gh-aw`) — 55/100 Foundation

github-actions[bot]
Bot Jun 11, 2026
Author