[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-06-16 #39513
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Session Insights. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #39754. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🤖 Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-06-16
Executive Summary
Key Metrics
7‐day completion average (06‐10..06‐16: 40, 18, 4, 38, 8, 12, 12) = 18.9%. Today (12%) sits below the 7‐day average; the saw‐tooth recovery/regression oscillation continues with no recovery spike this run.
📈 Session Trends Analysis
Completion Patterns
Completion rate held flat at 12% for a second day, well below the volatile peaks of 06‐10 (40%) and 06‐13 (38%). The successful-completion line stays low and stable (6 today) while the gate-swept line dominates at 44 — the persistent "approve-to-run" bottleneck rather than agent failure.
Duration & Efficiency
Median duration stays pinned at 0 (the bimodal gate-sweep signature): 44 runs never execute, so all duration mass concentrates in the 6 successes (3.2–21.6 min). Average duration tracks the count of non-zero-duration successes, confirming there is no "slow grind" tail — runs either complete quickly or never start.
Success Factors ✅
Running Copilot cloud agentruns succeeded (6.6 / 8.6 / 11.0 / 21.6 min). Cloud-agent reliability remains the single strongest success signal.Running Copilot Code Reviewruns succeeded in 3.2–3.6 min, below the ~8‐min cloud-agent floor.update-report-workflow3/11 (27.3%) andimpact-efficiency-report-poc2/10 (20%) out-converted the heavybump-mcpg-to-v03261/16 (6.25%).Failure Signals⚠️
bump-mcpg-to-v0326ran 15 gate sweeps for a single success (6.25%). Heavy CI fan-out per branch is the dominant inefficiency.action_required0‐duration — pure wasted scheduling/queue overhead, no agent work performed.Orphaned Branch Escalation Alerts 🚨
Summary
Escalation Candidate Details
Escalation Candidates
✅ No orphaned branches exceed the escalation threshold today.
All 4 open
copilot/*PRs (#39486, #39386, #39300, #39100) are assigned to Copilot, and the only 2 in‐progress workflow runs are both onmain(housekeeping + this analysis workflow). Nocopilot/*branch currently has any active (in‐progress) gate firings, so gate_count = 0 for every open Copilot PR.The remaining 6 open PRs are housekeeping/bot branches (jsweep, doc‐healer, caveman, linter‐miner, dependabot, dead‐code) with 0 gate firings and no agent expectation.
CI Waste Estimate
action_requiredgate sweeps in the session set are approval-blocked, not agent-orphaned — they consume queue/scheduling overhead but ~0 execution minutes, and every owning branch has Copilot assigned.Notable Observations
Branch Lifecycle, Tooling & Data Diagnostics
Branch Lifecycle (gate sweeps → successes)
copilot/bump-mcpg-to-v0326copilot/update-report-workflowcopilot/impact-efficiency-report-poccopilot/add-custom-validation-safe-outputscopilot/update-cache-misconfiguration-algorithmcopilot/fix-github-actions-job-agent-againBranch concentration: top‐3 branches account for 74% of all sessions (32% / 22% / 20%). All 6 branches are
copilot/*.Loop Detection / Context Issues
this command requires an OAuth token). Behavioral, loop, and context-confusion analysis cannot be performed for the 24th+ consecutive day. All metrics in this report derive from CI/workflow-run metadata only.Temporal Clustering
fix-github-actions-job-agent-againtailadd-custom-validation+update-cache-misconfigurationtailExperimental Analysis
Standard analysis only — no experimental strategy this run (random gate value 57 ≥ 30 threshold).
Actionable Recommendations
For Users Writing Task Descriptions
Running Copilot cloud agentsucceeded 4/4. Scope tasks so they run as full agent sessions rather than spawning many short CI gate sweeps.For System Improvements
bump-mcpg-to-v0326fired 15 approval gates for 1 success. Consolidating or auto-approving trusted gate workflows would cut the 88% gate-sweep overhead directly.For Tool Development
{session}-conversation.txtretrieval would convert this from a metadata report into true behavioral analysis.Historical Trends & Statistical Summary
Trends Over Time
Statistical Summary
Next Steps
bump-mcpg-to-v0326-style 16:1 sweep ratios)References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions