[safe-output-health] π₯ Safe Output Health Report β 2026-06-25 #41386
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Safe Output Health Monitor. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #41613. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
agent/activationjobs (OUT OF SCOPE)How "0 safe-output failures" is established
A safe-output job hard failure always forces the run conclusion to
failure. So enumerating every run-level failure (4) and confirming none of them failed in thesafe_outputsjob proves 0 safe-output hard failures across all 57 runs β without auditing all 57 individually. All 4 failures were independently audited via theauditMCP tool (jobs[]), and 6 additional production real-write runs were sampled to confirmsafe_outputs=success.Safe Output Job Statistics
successIn-Scope Findings
None. No safe-output job failed, no message failed actuation, no validation rejection, no soft-recovery edge case was triggered in the window.
Out-of-Scope Run Failures (agent/activation jobs β not safe-output health)
These are reported by other monitors; listed here only to show none touched safe outputs:
agent(ran 4.3m, no telemetry)agent(ran 8.4m)activation(failed pre-agent, 1.8m)agent(ran 3.9m)Note on Code Simplifier
Code Simplifier's
agentjob has now failed on 06-10, 06-20, 06-21 and again 06-25 (it recovered 06-22, 06-24). This is a recurring agent-job offender, but every time itssafe_outputsjob either succeeds or is cleanly skipped β the handoff path is healthy. Routing the underlying agent failure to the appropriate agent-health monitor is recommended (out of scope here).Sampled Production Real-Write Runs (all
safe_outputs=success)Recurring Cluster Status
smoke_target_context_resolution_hardfail_family(06-11/06-14/06-15/06-24)workflow_dispatchSmoke Claude/Copilot in window. Latent/OPEN.review_path_unresolved_422Path-variant (pr_review_buffer.cjs:554)changeset/jsweep branch-pin bundle(06-17, 06-23)safe_outputs=success; cluster did not hard-fail. Changeset Generator absent. occurrences still 2.lintmonster update_issue target:triggering(06-11)assign_to_agent/hide_comment int-vs-stringadd_labelsclean) β latent.Recommendations
Critical / High
Process / Follow-up (carry-over, unchanged priority)
review_path_unresolved_422Path-variant predicate fix (pr_review_buffer.cjs:554β match"Path could not be resolved"in addition to"Line could not be resolved"). It has been UNVALIDATED for 28 consecutive audits because no Path-variant 422 has fired. Recommend a synthetic smoke that forces a Path-variant 422 rather than waiting for an organic reproduction.add_labels/remove_labels/update_issuehard-fail on no-triggering-context while review-comment handlers soft-skip β should be unified to soft-skip. It simply wasn't exercised today; absence is not a fix.Work Item Plans
Work Item 1: Unify no-context handler behavior to soft-skip
add_labels/remove_labels/update_issuehard-fail ("No issue/PR number available" / "Target is triggering but not running in issue context") whilecreate_pull_request_review_comment/reply_*soft-skip (β). Make label/update handlers soft-skip with a β message when no target context resolves.add_labels/remove_labels/update_issueemit a soft-skip, not a job failure.workflow_dispatchSmoke Copilot run with no triggering issue/PR yieldssafe_outputs=success.Work Item 2: Validate the 422 Path-variant fallback
pr_review_buffer.cjs:554predicate fix is unverified in production. Add a deterministic smoke that submits a review comment against an unresolvable path position."Path could not be resolved"422.Historical Context & Trends
review_path_unresolved_422Path-variant remains the longest-running unvalidated fix (28 audits).Metrics & KPIs
Next Steps
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions