[security-observability] Daily Security Observability Report — 2026-06-29 #42310
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion was automatically closed because it expired on 2026-07-02T17:34:11.771Z.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Executive Summary
Today's unified security observability report covers 118 firewall-enabled agentic workflow runs from 2026-06-29 (the available analysis window). The firewall monitored 8,648 total network requests with a 99.5% allow rate — the infrastructure remains largely healthy and well-configured. Four blocked domain categories were identified, the most notable being
awmg-mcpg(the internal MCP gateway), which was attempted 34 times by 3 workflows operating inside sandboxed containers where the gateway is inaccessible. This represents a misconfiguration to remediate rather than a security threat.On the DIFC (Data Integrity and Flow Control) front, the integrity-filtering subsystem returned zero filtered events in the last 7 days, indicating no MCP tool calls were blocked for integrity or secrecy violations. This is a positive signal, either reflecting clean data flow or a period of reduced DIFC-tagged traffic. Both signals together paint a stable security posture with targeted remediation needed for a small set of network allowlist gaps.
🔥 Firewall Analysis
Key Firewall Metrics
📈 Firewall Request Trends
Network traffic peaked at the 15:00 UTC hour with 2,111 allowed requests across 26 concurrent runs, and dipped at 13:00 UTC (902 requests, 12 runs). The 12:00 UTC hour recorded the highest block count (23), driven primarily by
awmg-mcpgattempts andproxy.golang.orgblocks. Overall, the traffic pattern is consistent with scheduled workflow activity, with no anomalous spikes.Top Blocked Domains
The
awmg-mcpginternal hostname dominates the blocked list (34 requests, 3 workflows). This indicates those agents are attempting to reach the MCP gateway directly from inside their sandbox, which is architecturally incorrect. The remaining blocks (proxy.golang.org×4,storage.googleapis.com×1,release-assets.githubusercontent.com×1) represent missing allowlist entries for Go toolchain and release-asset workflows.Most Frequently Blocked Domains
📋 Policy Rule Configuration (Active Firewall Policy)
Policy version: 1 | Firewall:
v0.27.13| Generated:2026-06-29T15:23:07.908Z*.grafana.net,*.sentry.io)📋 Top Allowed Domains by Request Volume
🔒 Firewall Security Recommendations
Add
proxy.golang.organdsum.golang.orgto the global Go workflow allowlist — Three workflows (PR Code Quality Reviewer, Impeccable Skills Reviewer, Package Specification Enforcer) are failing Go dependency resolution. Addproxy.golang.organdsum.golang.orgto.github/aw/network.mdfor Go-toolchain workflows.Add
storage.googleapis.comfor download-heavy workflows — Four workflows are intermittently blocked from Google Cloud Storage. Consider adding this to the allowlist for workflows that pull pre-built binaries or model assets.Add
release-assets.githubusercontent.comfor CLI Consistency Checker — This workflow attempts to download GitHub release assets via a redirect-resolved URL not covered by the basegithub.com/raw.githubusercontent.comallowlist.Investigate
awmg-mcpgaccess attempts — WorkflowsGitHub API Consumption Report Agent,Daily Max AI Credits Test, andConstraint Solving — Problem of the Dayare trying to reach the internalawmg-mcpg:8080MCP gateway directly from within the sandbox. This should be impossible by design; these agents should be using the pre-configured tool path. Review their workflow configuration to ensure they're not attempting to self-spawn tool calls to the gateway. The "Daily Max AI Credits Test (Intentionally Fails)" case may be expected, but the others need investigation.Consider flagging IP-address requests for review — Some workflows are making connections to raw IP addresses (e.g.,
151.101.x.x) which are GitHub's CDN nodes. These are currently allowed after passing raw-IP denial rules, but direct IP usage bypasses domain-name-based policy and could indicate misconfigured clients.🔒 DIFC Integrity Analysis
Key DIFC Metrics
📈 DIFC Events Over Time
No event data available for this reporting period. This could reflect a genuinely clean period with no integrity violations, or it may indicate the filtered-integrity log collection pipeline needs investigation.
🔧 Top Filtered Tools
No filtered tool data to report.
🏷️ Filter Reasons and Tags
No tag breakdown available.
💡 DIFC Tuning Recommendations
Verify DIFC collection pipeline health — The
filtered_integritylog query returned zero results for the 7-day window. Verify that the DIFC event ingestion pipeline is active and that thefiltered-logs.jsonis being populated correctly by the setup step.Establish a DIFC baseline — If the zero-event result is genuine, document it as a baseline for future comparison. A sudden spike in filtered events would then be immediately detectable against this clean baseline.
Review DIFC coverage of high-volume workflows — The 118 firewall-enabled workflows include several high-tool-activity runs (e.g., Issue Monster with Pi engine, Agent Persona Explorer). Confirm that DIFC monitoring is configured and active for these workflows.
Generated by the Daily Security Observability workflow (consolidated from Daily Firewall Reporter + Daily DIFC Analyzer)
Analysis window: Last 7 days (available data: 2026-06-29) | Repository: github/gh-aw
Run: §28388325811
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions