[geo-optimizer] GEO Audit Report — 2026-07-03 #43248
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by GEO Optimizer Daily Audit. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #43417. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
GEO Audit Report — github/gh-aw
Audit Date: 2026-07-03
Run: §28673522290
📊 Scores
github.github.com/gh-aw/)github.com/github/gh-aw)✅ Top Strengths
🚨 Critical Gaps
github.github.com/gh-aw/has norobots.txt. AI crawlers operate in an ambiguous permission state. This single gap costs 18 points and affects all 195 discovered sitemap pages.github.github.com/gh-aw/. This is the second-largest gap (18 pts) and affects the entire site./.well-known/ai.txt,/ai/summary.json,/ai/faq.json, nor/ai/service.jsonexist on either target./blog/3–/blog/10) score 30–33 with no schema at all.🔧 Recommended Fixes
Ordered by estimated score impact:
Create
robots.txtfor docs site (+18 pts, all pages affected)Run:
geo robots --base-url https://github.github.com/gh-aw/and host the output athttps://github.github.com/gh-aw/robots.txt. Explicitly allow GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended.Create
/llms.txtfor docs site (+18 pts, all pages)Run:
geo llms --base-url https://github.github.com/gh-aw/to generate a structured LLM index. Host athttps://github.github.com/gh-aw/llms.txt.Add AI discovery endpoints to docs site (+6 pts)
Create
/.well-known/ai.txt,/ai/summary.json,/ai/faq.json, and/ai/service.json. See spec for schema.Add Schema JSON-LD to README / GitHub repo page (+16 pts on README)
Add WebSite, Organization (with sameAs to Wikipedia/Wikidata), and FAQPage JSON-LD. This brings the README score from Foundation toward Good.
Add
WebAppschema to docs site (+4 pts)Currently missing from docs site schema. Add
SoftwareApplication/WebApplicationtype withapplicationCategory,operatingSystem, andoffers.Sync schema description with meta description on docs site
schema_desc_matches_metaisfalse— align them to fix the brand-consistency penalty.Add numerical statistics to docs site content (±40% AI visibility per audit)
The docs homepage has 0 numbers. Add concrete data points (e.g., supported workflow count, time savings, bot coverage).
📋 Full Breakdown by Category — Docs Site
Platform Citation Scores:
Trust Stack: Grade C (15/25) — Technical: 3/5, Identity: 3/5, Social: 4/5, Academic: 1/5, Consistency: 4/5
Negative signals: Hidden text (display:none), keyword stuffing ('github' 2.8%), video without VideoObject schema
📋 Full Breakdown by Category — README
llms-full.txtPlatform Citation Scores:
Trust Stack: Grade C (16/25) — Technical: 5/5, Identity: 3/5, Social: 1/5, Academic: 4/5, Consistency: 3/5
Content Decay Risk: High — version strings ("v0.81.6"), release counts ("398"), and recency language without dateModified schema
📄 Sitemap Page Scores (top 5 and bottom 5 of 20 audited)
Top pages:
/blog/2026-01-13-meet-the-workflows-continuous-improvement/(home)/blog/2026-01-13-meet-the-workflows-continuous-refactoring/blog/2026-01-12-welcome-to-pelis-agent-factory/blog/2026-01-13-meet-the-workflows-advanced-analyticsWorst pages:
/blog/10/blog/8/blog/6,/blog/7,/blog/3All pages score 0/18 on robots.txt, 0/18 on llms.txt, and 0/6 on AI discovery — these three gaps are consistent across the entire site.
Automated audit powered by geo-optimizer-skill · Run logs
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions