You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"Thanks for asking me to work on this. I will get started on it..."
→ Closed ❌
Key Insights
Precision beats breadth: Bug-fix PRs (81.6% success) and refactoring PRs (88.9%) outperform broad feature PRs (78.2%). Prompts that name the specific code path, function, or symptom fare much better than ones describing a new system to build.
Documentation PRs are safest: 100% merge rate (7/7). Prompts asking for doc corrections, spec alignment, or README fixes virtually never get rejected.
WIP signals and multi-scope PRs are risky: Closed PRs often bundle multiple unrelated changes (AWEngine adapter + aw_harness + frontmatter) or declare [WIP] intent. Single-concern prompts merge at a significantly higher rate.
Prompt length is not a differentiator: Merged (192 words avg) and closed (190 words avg) prompts are nearly identical in length — what matters is specificity and scope, not verbosity.
Recommendations
Based on today's analysis:
DO — Reference the specific file, function, or symptom: fix parser over-match in isCoreLikeIdentifier beats improve identifier matching.
DO — Keep each PR focused on a single concern; avoid bundling feat A + feat B + feat C in one prompt.
DO — Use conventional commit prefixes (fix:, docs:, deps:) — they correlate with higher merge rates by signaling bounded scope.
AVOID — Opening PRs with [WIP] in the title; these are rarely merged without human rework.
AVOID — Feature prompts that introduce a wholly new workflow or system without prior design alignment; these close at 21.8% vs docs at 0%.
Historical Trends
Date
Total PRs
Merged
Success Rate
Top Category
2026-07-04
1000
798
81.1%
Bug Fix
2026-07-03
1000
801
81.8%
Bug Fix
Trend: Success rate is stable (~81%), with bug-fix dominating the workload. Feature PRs shrank from 282 → 167 day-over-day, while bug-fix PRs grew from 650 → 801, suggesting more targeted fix-oriented prompting is occurring.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Summary
Analysis Period: Last 30 days
Total PRs: 1000 | Merged: 798 (81.1%) | Closed: 186 (18.9%) | Open: 16
Prompt Categories and Success Rates
Prompt Analysis
✅ Successful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in merged PRs:
workflow,actions,agent,runs,output,safe,test,jsonfix(222),add(141),refactor(35),update(31),test(24)Top verb success note:
fixappears in 222 merged titles vs 44 closed — a 5:1 ratio, indicating precise bug-targeting prompts strongly outperform vague prompts.Example successful prompts:
PR docs(spec): fix parser and workflow README accuracy issues #43394 —
docs(spec): fix parser and workflow README accuracy issuesPR require-await-core-summary-write: tighten isCoreLikeIdentifier to exact alias set #43382 —
require-await-core-summary-write: tighten isCoreLikeIdentifier to exact alias setPR deps: bump bubbletea v2.0.8, lipgloss v2.0.5 #43375 —
deps: bump bubbletea v2.0.8, lipgloss v2.0.5❌ Unsuccessful Prompt Patterns
Common characteristics in closed PRs:
WIPin title, broad scope words (introduce,scaffold,detect,feat:), vague goalsmodel,issue,shared,docs,outputs,claudeExample unsuccessful prompts:
PR Add daily HTML-change → Playwright test generator workflow #43421 —
Add daily HTML-change → Playwright test generator workflowPR feat: AWEngine runtime adapter, aw_harness.cjs scaffold, and threat-detection-suppress frontmatter #43416 —
feat: AWEngine runtime adapter, aw_harness.cjs scaffold, and threat-detection-suppress frontmatterPR [WIP] Add gh-aw-detection: true to audit workflow scaffold #43402 —
[WIP] Add gh-aw-detection: true to audit workflow scaffoldKey Insights
AWEngine adapter + aw_harness + frontmatter) or declare[WIP]intent. Single-concern prompts merge at a significantly higher rate.Recommendations
Based on today's analysis:
fix parser over-match in isCoreLikeIdentifierbeatsimprove identifier matching.feat A + feat B + feat Cin one prompt.fix:,docs:,deps:) — they correlate with higher merge rates by signaling bounded scope.[WIP]in the title; these are rarely merged without human rework.Historical Trends
Trend: Success rate is stable (~81%), with bug-fix dominating the workload. Feature PRs shrank from 282 → 167 day-over-day, while bug-fix PRs grew from 650 → 801, suggesting more targeted fix-oriented prompting is occurring.
References:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions