[copilot-session-insights] Daily Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-07-05 #43512
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Copilot Session Insights. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #43746. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🤖 Copilot Agent Session Analysis — 2026-07-05
Executive Summary
Key Metrics
📈 Session Trends Analysis
Completion Patterns
Today's 16% is a sharp reversion toward the 4–20% floor band after yesterday's 54% single-day spike — the spike did not hold. Trailing-30d completion median ≈ 8%, so today is modestly above a typical day but far below the 07-04 high.
Duration & Efficiency
Whole-fleet mean (0.62 min) is dragged down by 38 zero-duration gate no-ops; the 12 runs that executed averaged 2.58 min (max 5.68). Loop bars read 0 by construction (no transcripts), not by measurement.
Success Factors ✅
uk-ai-resilience-*andscan-user-provided-steps.Failure Signals⚠️
action_required(approval-gated). 76% of runs are approval-blocked.cli-tools-test-fix-comparison-deltafired 24 gate runs, 1 success (4.2%) — 23 re-fires.scan-user-provided-steps(3.8 min) anduk-ai-resilience-fix-graphql-id-injection(5.68 min).Orphaned Branch Escalation Alerts 🚨
✅ No orphaned branches exceed the threshold. The only branches with a live gate footprint are both Copilot-assigned:
Assignee login on this repo is
Copilot; the reference jqcopilot-swe-agentliteral was adapted to match. CI waste from orphans: 0 — 13/15 open PRs Copilot-assigned; the 2 unassigned carry no gate saturation.Diagnostics — per-branch, tools, loops
Per-branch completion
Workflow usage — most-fired: Q (10), Agentic Commands (10), Smoke CI (5), CWI (4), CGO (4). Top successes: Smoke CI, Copilot Code Review, Doc Build, CWI (2 each). Only failing workflow: CGO (2/2).
Loops/context: not measurable (transcripts empty). Structural churn proxy: cli-tools-test re-fired 24 gate runs with 1 success — the closest "stuck" signal from metadata.
Experimental Analysis — BGSI (Branch Gate-Saturation Index)
Correlates per-branch gate-run count against completion (success) rate.
Findings:
action_requiredapproval-gate churn (re-fires), not productivity.Effectiveness: Medium · Recommendation: Refine — track 2–3 weeks to confirm stability; control for hard tasks that legitimately re-run gates.
Actionable Recommendations
For users: (1) Scope branches narrowly — single-defect intents completed 60–75% vs 4% for broad comparative ones. (2) Expect approval gates on maintenance workflows (Q, Agentic Commands) — low completion there is a policy artifact, not task quality.
For system: (1) Debounce gate re-fires — 24 runs on one branch in 18 min is pure churn; per-branch/commit dispatch de-dup would cut
action_requiredno-op volume. Impact: High. (2) Surface CGO failure detail — sole failing workflow (2/2). Impact: Medium.For tooling: Restore agent conversation transcripts — 38 days without them blocks all behavioral analysis; highest-leverage fix for this workflow's mission. Needed every run.
Statistical Summary & Trends
Completion trajectory: 20% (07-01) → 8% → 4% → 54% (07-04 spike) → 16% (today); reverted to the 4–20% floor band. Orphan health: 0% for ~41 consecutive days vs 40% baseline.
Next Steps
scan-user-provided-stepsanduk-ai-resilience-fix-graphql-id-injectionReferences:
Auto-generated 2026-07-05 · Run ID 28733661880 · Workflow: Copilot Session Insights
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions