[Auto-Triage] Auto-Triage Issues Report

[github-actions[bot]]

🏷️ Auto-Triage Report Summary

Report Period: 2026-07-06 scheduled run
Issues Processed: 1
Labels Applied: 2 total labels
Still Unlabeled: 0 issues in this batch

Key Metrics

• Success Rate: 100%
• Average Confidence: Medium
• Most Common Classifications: automation (1), needs-triage (1)

Classification Summary

Issue	Applied Labels	Confidence	Key Reasoning
#43851	automation, needs-triage	Medium	Automated PR Sous Chef run report opened as an issue; clearly automation-related but no dedicated report/status label in the provided rules

View Detailed Classification Analysis

Detailed Breakdown

Issue #43851:

• Keywords Detected: "automated status report", "PR Sous Chef", workflow run metadata
• Pattern Match: Automation-generated issue/report rather than a user bug report or feature request
• Uncertainty Factors: Repository-specific status-report issue category is not represented in the available label set
• Reason for needs-triage: Human maintainers may want a more specific label taxonomy for bot-generated report issues
• Confidence Score: 75%

Label Distribution

View Label Statistics

• automation: 1 issue (100% of processed)
• needs-triage: 1 issue (100% of processed)

Recommendations

• Consider adding a dedicated label for bot-generated operational reports if these should remain searchable separately from product triage
• Continue conservative fallback to needs-triage for non-user-facing operational issues

Confidence Assessment

• Overall Success: Medium
• Human Review Needed: 1 issue flagged with needs-triage
• Next Steps: Review whether automated status-report issues should be auto-labeled differently or excluded from unlabeled triage

References:

• §28816293025

Generated by 🔧 Auto-Triage Issues · 2.81 AIC · ⌖ 15 AIC · ⊞ 4.1K · ◷

• expires on Jul 7, 2026, 11:11 AM UTC-08:00

[github-actions[bot]]

This discussion has been marked as outdated by Auto-Triage Issues.

A newer discussion is available at Discussion #43900.