Add personas to the specification template

[DiegoObethBatista]

Why Personas: They make specs concrete by tying every feature to real roles and permissions. Without them, security gets fuzzy and tests drift into abstract “user does X” cases.

Why?

• Security: who can view, edit, approve, delete. No generic “user” role.
• Functionality: every feature must tie to someone real. If it doesn’t serve a persona, it’s probably scope creep.
• Testing: scenarios become real-world examples, so TDD isn’t just “a user does X” but “a Case Worker updates a case but cannot approved
• Conflicts: if roles need different outcomes, we see it early.

How to fit them in:

• Add a short Personas section: role, goal, context, constraints, permissions.
• Tag each requirement with one or more personas. Example: FR-003 [Case Worker, Ops Manager].
• Write at least one scenario per persona (normal path + exception).
• Add a simple table to check coverage. If a requirement serves nobody, cut it.

[michaelkoss]

I would love to see a personas.md in the memories folder. I think they would span different specs, so placing them side-by-side with the constitution.md would be ideal.

You're probably already thinking this, just throwing my two cents into the ring.

[Aki-07]

Hi @localden, Would love to work on this! Can I pick this up?