resources.Concat fails with processed scss file on hugo 0.49 #5269
Comments
moorereason
changed the title
bep
added a commit
to bep/hugo
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2018
In Hugo `0.49` we improved type support in `slice`. This has an unfortunate side effect in that `resources.Concat` now expects something that can resolve to `resource.Resources`.
This worked for most situations, but when you try to `slice` different `Resource` objects, you would be getting `[]interface {}` and not `resource.Resources`. And `concat` would fail:
```bash
error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat.
```
This commit fixes that by simplifying the type checking logic in `Slice`:
* If the first item implements the `Slicer` interface, we try that
* If the above fails or the first item does not implement `Slicer`, we just return the `[]interface {}`
Fixes gohugoio#5269
bep
added a commit
to bep/hugo
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2018
In Hugo `0.49` we improved type support in `slice`. This has an unfortunate side effect in that `resources.Concat` now expects something that can resolve to `resource.Resources`.
This worked for most situations, but when you try to `slice` different `Resource` objects, you would be getting `[]interface {}` and not `resource.Resources`. And `concat` would fail:
```bash
error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat.
```
This commit fixes that by simplifying the type checking logic in `Slice`:
* If the first item implements the `Slicer` interface, we try that
* If the above fails or the first item does not implement `Slicer`, we just return the `[]interface {}`
Fixes gohugoio#5269
bep
added a commit
to bep/hugo
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2018
In Hugo `0.49` we improved type support in `slice`. This has an unfortunate side effect in that `resources.Concat` now expects something that can resolve to `resource.Resources`.
This worked for most situations, but when you try to `slice` different `Resource` objects, you would be getting `[]interface {}` and not `resource.Resources`. And `concat` would fail:
```bash
error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat.
```
This commit fixes that by simplifying the type checking logic in `Slice`:
* If the first item implements the `Slicer` interface, we try that
* If the above fails or the first item does not implement `Slicer`, we just return the `[]interface {}`
Fixes gohugoio#5269
bep
added a commit
to bep/hugo
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2018
In Hugo `0.49` we improved type support in `slice`. This has an unfortunate side effect in that `resources.Concat` now expects something that can resolve to `resource.Resources`.
This worked for most situations, but when you try to `slice` different `Resource` objects, you would be getting `[]interface {}` and not `resource.Resources`. And `concat` would fail:
```bash
error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat.
```
This commit fixes that by simplifying the type checking logic in `Slice`:
* If the first item implements the `Slicer` interface, we try that
* If the above fails or the first item does not implement `Slicer`, we just return the `[]interface {}`
Fixes gohugoio#5269
bep
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2018
In Hugo `0.49` we improved type support in `slice`. This has an unfortunate side effect in that `resources.Concat` now expects something that can resolve to `resource.Resources`.
This worked for most situations, but when you try to `slice` different `Resource` objects, you would be getting `[]interface {}` and not `resource.Resources`. And `concat` would fail:
```bash
error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat.
```
This commit fixes that by simplifying the type checking logic in `Slice`:
* If the first item implements the `Slicer` interface, we try that
* If the above fails or the first item does not implement `Slicer`, we just return the `[]interface {}`
Fixes #5269
bep
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2018
In Hugo `0.49` we improved type support in `slice`. This has an unfortunate side effect in that `resources.Concat` now expects something that can resolve to `resource.Resources`.
This worked for most situations, but when you try to `slice` different `Resource` objects, you would be getting `[]interface {}` and not `resource.Resources`. And `concat` would fail:
```bash
error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat.
```
This commit fixes that by simplifying the type checking logic in `Slice`:
* If the first item implements the `Slicer` interface, we try that
* If the above fails or the first item does not implement `Slicer`, we just return the `[]interface {}`
Fixes #5269
kidynamit
added a commit
to rehive/docs-portal
that referenced
this issue
Oct 10, 2018
|
This issue has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
When running
this fails with
executing "partials/head/css.html" at <resources.Concat>: error calling Concat: slice []interface {} not supported in concat. But this did work with 0.48.I suppose this bug come from e27fd4c.
If a example is need: Building https://github.com/vickylai/hugo-theme-introduction fails on Hugo 0.49.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: