Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Feature parity questions like this matter more in Go than people sometimes admit, because missing memory or config primitives change the architecture you build around the SDK, not just the ergonomics. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the question -- good news on one front: Agent Config is already supported in ADK Go as of v0.3.0. You can use YAML-based agent definitions with For Context Compaction -- this is on our roadmap for ADK Go. We've heard this feedback from multiple users and understand the impact - we're actively working on sharing a public roadmap for better transparency on timelines, which will be available soon. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Are there any plans to bring the ADK Python feature set into alignment with ADK Go?
In particular, I’m interested in:
• Context / compaction:
https://google.github.io/adk-docs/context/compaction/
• Agents / config:
https://google.github.io/adk-docs/agents/config/
It would be great to understand whether feature parity is on the roadmap, and if so, what the expected timeline might look like.
Appreciate any insights you can share.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions