Skip to content
/ linux Public

Commit 77ac28b

Browse files
floatiousSasha Levin
authored andcommitted
Revert "PCI: dw-rockchip: Don't wait for link since we can detect Link Up"
[ Upstream commit fc62980 ] This reverts commit ec9fd49. While this fake hotplugging was a nice idea, it has shown that this feature does not handle PCIe switches correctly: pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: [bus 43-41] end is updated to 43 pci_bus 0004:43: busn_res: can not insert [bus 43] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci 0004:42:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 43] cannot be assigned for them pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: [bus 44-41] end is updated to 44 pci_bus 0004:44: busn_res: can not insert [bus 44] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci 0004:42:02.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 44] cannot be assigned for them pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: [bus 45-41] end is updated to 45 pci_bus 0004:45: busn_res: can not insert [bus 45] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci 0004:42:06.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 45] cannot be assigned for them pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46-41] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: [bus 46-41] end is updated to 46 pci_bus 0004:46: busn_res: can not insert [bus 46] under [bus 42-41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 42-41]) pci 0004:42:0e.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 46] cannot be assigned for them pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: [bus 42-41] end is updated to 46 pci_bus 0004:42: busn_res: can not insert [bus 42-46] under [bus 41] (conflicts with (null) [bus 41]) pci 0004:41:00.0: devices behind bridge are unusable because [bus 42-46] cannot be assigned for them pcieport 0004:40:00.0: bridge has subordinate 41 but max busn 46 During the initial scan, PCI core doesn't see the switch and since the Root Port is not hot plug capable, the secondary bus number gets assigned as the subordinate bus number. This means, the PCI core assumes that only one bus will appear behind the Root Port since the Root Port is not hot plug capable. This works perfectly fine for PCIe endpoints connected to the Root Port, since they don't extend the bus. However, if a PCIe switch is connected, then there is a problem when the downstream busses starts showing up and the PCI core doesn't extend the subordinate bus number and bridge resources after initial scan during boot. The long term plan is to migrate this driver to the upcoming pwrctrl APIs that are supposed to handle this problem elegantly. Suggested-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org> Tested-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Acked-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251222064207.3246632-9-cassel@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
1 parent 4cccf81 commit 77ac28b

File tree

1 file changed

+0
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+0
-1
lines changed

drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-dw-rockchip.c

Lines changed: 0 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -549,7 +549,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_configure_rc(struct platform_device *pdev,
549549

550550
pp = &rockchip->pci.pp;
551551
pp->ops = &rockchip_pcie_host_ops;
552-
pp->use_linkup_irq = true;
553552

554553
ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp);
555554
if (ret) {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)