Commit d5559ac
erofs: handle 48-bit blocks/uniaddr for extra devices
[ Upstream commit 63c2f06 ]
erofs_init_device() only reads blocks_lo and uniaddr_lo from the
on-disk device slot, ignoring blocks_hi and uniaddr_hi that were
introduced alongside the 48-bit block addressing feature.
For the primary device (dif0), erofs_read_superblock() already handles
this correctly by combining blocks_lo with blocks_hi when 48-bit
layout is enabled. But the same logic was not applied to extra
devices.
With a 48-bit EROFS image using extra devices whose uniaddr or blocks
exceed 32-bit range, the truncated values cause erofs_map_dev() to
compute wrong physical addresses, leading to silent data corruption.
Fix this by reading blocks_hi and uniaddr_hi in erofs_init_device()
when 48-bit layout is enabled, consistent with the primary device
handling. Also fix the erofs_deviceslot on-disk definition where
blocks_hi was incorrectly declared as __le32 instead of __le16.
Fixes: 61ba89b ("erofs: add 48-bit block addressing on-disk support")
Suggested-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>1 parent 62c4456 commit d5559ac
2 files changed
Lines changed: 8 additions & 4 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
44 | 44 | | |
45 | 45 | | |
46 | 46 | | |
47 | | - | |
| 47 | + | |
48 | 48 | | |
49 | | - | |
| 49 | + | |
50 | 50 | | |
51 | 51 | | |
52 | 52 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
140 | 140 | | |
141 | 141 | | |
142 | 142 | | |
| 143 | + | |
143 | 144 | | |
144 | 145 | | |
145 | 146 | | |
| |||
186 | 187 | | |
187 | 188 | | |
188 | 189 | | |
189 | | - | |
190 | | - | |
| 190 | + | |
| 191 | + | |
| 192 | + | |
| 193 | + | |
| 194 | + | |
191 | 195 | | |
192 | 196 | | |
193 | 197 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments