Skip to content

Conversation

@ejona86
Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 commented May 14, 2018

They were removed in 137c74d since it was believed they were unnecessary.
However, since they are in a macro and not a rule, they are relative to the
caller, not their definition.

Added building the examples to the kokoro CI. Note that this means the examples
are built twice: once in grpc-java's build and once in their own (because it
has a WORKSPACE). Given that the Bazel build is our fastest build, this
slowdown won't probably be an issue.

CC @carl-mastrangelo

This is a backport of #4288

They were removed in 137c74d since it was believed they were unnecessary.
However, since they are in a macro and not a rule, they are relative to the
caller, not their definition.

Added building the examples to the kokoro CI. Note that this means the examples
are built twice: once in grpc-java's build and once in their own (because it
has a WORKSPACE). Given that the Bazel build is our fastest build, this
slowdown won't probably be an issue.
Copy link
Contributor

@dapengzhang0 dapengzhang0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ejona86 ejona86 merged commit 005dfb8 into grpc:v1.11.x May 14, 2018
@ejona86 ejona86 deleted the backport-1.11-fix-proto-bazel branch May 14, 2018 22:35
@lock lock bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 18, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants