Skip to content

Conversation

@Resonance1584
Copy link
Contributor

@Resonance1584 Resonance1584 commented Oct 24, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Fixed code examples and markdown formatting in upgrade documentation for improved clarity and consistency.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 24, 2025 7:53pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation corrections in the GitHub v3-to-v4 upgrade guide: a missing closing parenthesis is added to a find_in_parent_folders() function reference, and backtick formatting is standardized in a reference to access-control-pipelines-apply.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation fixes
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/previous-versions/upgrading-github-v3-to-v4.md
Added missing closing parenthesis to find_in_parent_folders("root.hcl") code snippet; standardized backtick formatting around access-control-pipelines-apply reference

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ZachGoldberg
  • oredavids

Poem

✨ A parenthesis found its way home,
Backticks aligned in perfect tone,
Small fixes make docs shine so bright,
Details matter—polish makes right! 🎯

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Migration guide fixes" accurately describes the content of this pull request, which makes corrections to a migration guide document (specifically the upgrading-github-v3-to-v4.md file). The changes involve fixing a code snippet and correcting markdown formatting, both of which fall under the umbrella of "fixes" to the migration guide. While the title could be more specific about what types of fixes are being made, it clearly communicates the primary change and is directly related to the changeset without being misleading or off-topic.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch Resonance1584-patch-2

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd054a7 and dd65db5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/previous-versions/upgrading-github-v3-to-v4.md (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: validate_build
  • GitHub Check: Validate generated content
  • GitHub Check: Pull Request has non-contributor approval
🔇 Additional comments (2)
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/previous-versions/upgrading-github-v3-to-v4.md (2)

100-100: Correct syntax fix for the Terragrunt function reference.

The addition of the missing closing parenthesis in find_in_parent_folders("root.hcl") fixes an incomplete code example in the progress checklist. This ensures the migration guide provides syntactically correct code that users can reference and copy directly into their repositories.


183-183: Consistent markdown formatting across the documentation.

Standardizing the backtick formatting around access-control-pipelines-apply to single backticks improves consistency with the rest of the document's markdown style and makes the note more readable.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@Resonance1584 Resonance1584 merged commit e6bd280 into main Oct 24, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants