Skip to content

Conversation

@ZachGoldberg
Copy link
Contributor

@ZachGoldberg ZachGoldberg commented Oct 24, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Renamed workflow input parameters and updated their descriptions in the drift detection installation guide to improve clarity.
    • Updated the referenced workflow version from v3 to v4.
    • Noted that example mappings in the guide still reference the old input names and may need alignment to avoid confusion.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 24, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 24, 2025 11:23pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Updated documentation for the drift-detection installation workflow: two GitHub workflow inputs were renamed (pathpipelines_drift_detection_filter, branch-namepipelines_drift_detection_branch) and the referenced action version bumped from v3 to v4. Example with: mappings still reference the old input names.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Workflow input renames & action version bump
docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/guides/installing-drift-detection.md
Renamed workflow inputs pathpipelines_drift_detection_filter and branch-namepipelines_drift_detection_branch; updated their descriptions; updated referenced GitHub Action version from v3v4. Example with: blocks still pass inputs.path and inputs.branch-name.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Areas to double-check:
    • Consistency between the newly declared input names and downstream with: mappings in the example workflow.
    • That the v4 action usage is compatible with the example parameters shown.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

v4

Suggested reviewers

  • oredavids

Poem

✨ Two inputs got a tidy rename,
Docs and examples play a naming game.
Version moved up, the action's brand new—
Check the mappings so they match through and through. 🛠️

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "Update Drift Detection install to use latest arg names" clearly and accurately reflects the main change in the diff: renaming GitHub workflow input parameters from path and branch-name to pipelines_drift_detection_filter and pipelines_drift_detection_branch in the drift detection installation documentation. The title is concise, avoids vague or generic terminology, and provides sufficient specificity that a teammate reviewing the history would immediately understand this is about updating argument/parameter names in the drift detection setup process. The language appropriately captures the essence of the changeset without requiring it to enumerate every detail.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ce81cf and b1d14cc.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/2.0/docs/pipelines/guides/installing-drift-detection.md (1 hunks)

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@ZachGoldberg ZachGoldberg changed the title Update installing-drift-detection.md Update Drift Detection install to use latest arg names Oct 24, 2025
oredavids
oredavids previously approved these changes Oct 24, 2025
@ZachGoldberg ZachGoldberg merged commit 7003bfd into main Oct 24, 2025
4 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants