Skip to content

Conversation

@floatdrop
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@yocontra
Copy link
Member

yocontra commented Jan 9, 2014

Why buffer: false? We should check that it handles all modes properly

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+6.73%) when pulling 0c937d2c559e8b2c567791a9967ec22aebaf4140 on floatdrop:100-percent-coverage into a054d3b on gulpjs:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+6.73%) when pulling e58754c on floatdrop:100-percent-coverage into a054d3b on gulpjs:master.

@yocontra
Copy link
Member

yocontra commented Jan 9, 2014

read false as well

@floatdrop
Copy link
Contributor Author

And here are the bugs :)

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+6.73%) when pulling 42d0248 on floatdrop:100-percent-coverage into a054d3b on gulpjs:master.

yocontra added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2014
@yocontra yocontra merged commit 099a8eb into gulpjs:master Jan 9, 2014
@yocontra
Copy link
Member

yocontra commented Jan 9, 2014

Thanks!

@floatdrop floatdrop deleted the 100-percent-coverage branch January 9, 2014 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants