Skip to content

Conversation

@DimCitus
Copy link
Collaborator

The waitpid() reading of the conditions that lead to a process being
reported are more complex than the previous implementation assumed.

@DimCitus DimCitus added bug Something isn't working Size: S Effort Estimate: Small Developer productivity Enhancements to ability to ship quality code labels Feb 12, 2021
@DimCitus DimCitus added this to the Sprint 2021 W6 W7 milestone Feb 12, 2021
@DimCitus DimCitus requested a review from JelteF February 12, 2021 16:42
@DimCitus DimCitus self-assigned this Feb 12, 2021
Comment on lines +644 to 647
else if (WIFEXITED(status) && WEXITSTATUS(status) == EXIT_CODE_QUIT)
{
logLevel = LOG_WARN;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: this could be moved in the WIFEXITED branch below

The waitpid() reading of the conditions that lead to a process being
reported are more complex than the previous implementation assumed.
@DimCitus DimCitus force-pushed the fix/supervisor-waitpid-diagnostic branch from 2928f19 to b872c25 Compare March 1, 2021 11:08
@DimCitus DimCitus merged commit 6079caf into master Mar 1, 2021
@DimCitus DimCitus deleted the fix/supervisor-waitpid-diagnostic branch March 1, 2021 11:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working Developer productivity Enhancements to ability to ship quality code Size: S Effort Estimate: Small

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants