If Resume helped you publish faster, here is the shortest support path

[happysnaker]

If this template saved you time, the intended shameless path is simple:

• if it just saved you setup time, tip directly on the support page
• if your page technically works but still feels generic / student-ish / not hireable enough, use the ¥29.9 quick read
• if your site and GitHub profile still tell two different stories, use the ¥99 async review

Fast links:

• Support: https://happysnaker.github.io/support/#from-resume
• Review page: https://happysnaker.github.io/review/
• Best payment note: Resume

What the paid path is actually for:

It is not a design-theory lecture. It is for people who already forked the template, filled in their content, and still feel that the result does not look convincing enough to recruiters.

[happysnaker]

Maintainer note:\n\nIf Resume helped you publish faster, the lowest-friction path is just a small direct tip with the note Resume on the support page: https://happysnaker.github.io/support/#from-resume\n\nIf your own portfolio technically works but still feels generic, student-ish, or disconnected from your GitHub profile, the better paid fit is the ¥29.9 quick read or ¥99 async review here: https://happysnaker.github.io/review/\n\nFastest email subjects if you already paid:\n- Quick read | resume site link\n- Async review | resume site or profile link\n\nI especially recommend the paid path when the real problem is not CSS, but positioning: what to hide, what to pin, and how to make the site and GitHub tell the same story.