Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backport 13205 to 1.2.x #13211

Closed
wants to merge 210 commits into from
Closed

backport 13205 to 1.2.x #13211

wants to merge 210 commits into from

Conversation

shoenig
Copy link
Member

@shoenig shoenig commented Jun 2, 2022

This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
* no-op commit due to failed cherry-picking

* docs: update json jobs docs (#12766)

* docs: update json jobs docs

Did you know that Nomad has not 1 but 2 JSON formats for jobs? 2½ if you
want to acknowledge that sometimes our JSON job representations have a
Job top-level wrapper and sometimes do not.

The 2½ formats are:
```
 1.   HCL JSON
 2.   Input API JSON (top-level Job field)
 2.5. Output API JSON (lacks top-level Job field)
```

`#2` is what our docs consider our API JSON. `#2.5` seems to be an
accident of history we can't fix with breaking API compatibility.

`#1` is an even more interesting accident of history: the `jobspec2`
package automatically detects if the input to Parse is JSON and switches
to a JSON parser. This behavior is undocumented, the format is
unspecified, and there is no official HashiCorp tooling to produce this
JSON from HCL. The plot thickens when you discover popular third party
tools like hcl2json.com and https://github.com/tmccombs/hcl2json seem to
produce JSON that `nomad run` accepts!

Since we have no telemetry around whether or not anyone passes HCL JSON
to `nomad run`, and people don't file bugs around features that Just
Work, I'm choosing to leave that code path in place and *acknowledged
but not suggested* in documentation.

See hashicorp/hcl#498 for a more comprehensive
discussion of what officially supporting HCL JSON in Nomad would look
like.

(I also added some of the missing fields to the (Input API flavor) JSON
Job documentation, but it still needs a lot of work to be
comprehensive.)

Co-authored-by: Tim Gross <tgross@hashicorp.com>

Co-authored-by: temp <temp@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Schurter <mschurter@hashicorp.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Gross <tgross@hashicorp.com>
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
Fix numerous go-getter security issues:

- Add timeouts to http, git, and hg operations to prevent DoS
- Add size limit to http to prevent resource exhaustion
- Disable following symlinks in both artifacts and `job run`
- Stop performing initial HEAD request to avoid file corruption on
  retries and DoS opportunities.

**Approach**

Since Nomad has no ability to differentiate a DoS-via-large-artifact vs
a legitimate workload, all of the new limits are configurable at the
client agent level.

The max size of HTTP downloads is also exposed as a node attribute so
that if some workloads have large artifacts they can specify a high
limit in their jobspecs.

In the future all of this plumbing could be extended to enable/disable
specific getters or artifact downloading entirely on a per-node basis.
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
…ttempt-2

tests: minor fixes for some docker tests
…elease/1.2.x (#13130)

This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
This pull request was automerged via backport-assistant
@shoenig shoenig requested a review from a team June 2, 2022 21:50
@shoenig shoenig requested a review from a team as a code owner June 2, 2022 21:50
@shoenig
Copy link
Member Author

shoenig commented Jun 2, 2022

nope

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2022

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 9, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet