Skip to content

Conversation

@trujillo-adam
Copy link
Contributor

We commented out the identity argument when we rewrote the import block reference because it hadn't yet been adopted by provider developers, which was leading to confusion. This PR re-adds the argument and provides an example.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Vercel Previews Deployed

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
Dev Portal ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Thu Sep 11 15:20:56 UTC 2025
Unified Docs API ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Thu Sep 11 15:14:45 UTC 2025

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Sep 8, 2025

Broken Link Checker

No broken links found! 🎉

@trujillo-adam trujillo-adam marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2025 20:29
@trujillo-adam trujillo-adam requested review from a team as code owners September 8, 2025 20:29
Copy link
Contributor

@robin-norwood robin-norwood left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm! Left some suggestions.

Co-authored-by: Robin Norwood <robin.norwood@gmail.com>
@trujillo-adam trujillo-adam merged commit 5db7d14 into main Sep 11, 2025
15 checks passed
@trujillo-adam trujillo-adam deleted the docs/reintroduce-identity-argument branch September 11, 2025 15:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants