Uniwind migration and commercial viability concerns #94
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hey! We have no commercial ties with Uniwind - it's simply the perfect match for us. Our reasons for using it include performance, Tailwind 4, oklch colours, CSS parser, and the ability to use the same design system across web and native - we now have nearly identical CSS files for both. Very important! We're constantly in contact with the Uniwind via Slack channel, so we can provide feedback in real time, which is very beneficial. You know the Uniwind team; they are very professional and responsible, and Unistyles just proves it. So once again, most projects will be fine using the free tier. Upgrading is only necessary if it suits your needs. Not everyone is building a social network with 2 billion users or a crypto wallet with millions of live updates per second where every frame counts. Regarding an alternative styling solution, it depends on Nativewind. We're still waiting for the official version 5 release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey! I've been following
heroui-nativefor a while and was interested in the recent migration fromnativewindtouniwind. However, I've discovered thatuniwindhas a pricing model that charges for core functionality like "zero re-renders," which concerns me as a potential user.My concerns:
heroui-native, especially forcommercial applications
Questions:
heroui-nativeanduniwind? Are they affiliated or independentprojects?
nativewindtouniwind?uniwindpremiumpricing?
nativewind?I'm genuinely interested in using this library, but the pricing model and unclear relationship between
the projects is currently a blocker for adoption. Any transparency you can provide would be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions