docs(i18n): Correct the descriptive text in the README_zh-hans.md #40941
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
This PR corrects an incomplete Simplified Chinese description in the documentation by adding the missing term "函数库" (library). The change ensures consistency with the Traditional Chinese version and fixes grammatical/semantic ambiguities.
Background & Motivation
The original Simplified Chinese text was incomplete, lacking a clear object to clarify the subject of the description. The corresponding Traditional Chinese reference text (which serves as the consistency baseline) includes the term
為 Jax、PyTorch 以及 TensorFlow 打造的先進自然語言處理函式庫
(where "函式庫" = Traditional Chinese for "library").Change Details
为 Jax、PyTorch 和 TensorFlow 打造的先进的自然语言处理
为 Jax、PyTorch 和 TensorFlow 打造的先进的自然语言处理函数库
Key Improvements
No dependencies are required for this change.
Fixes #N/A (No corresponding issue; this is a direct documentation accuracy improvement)
Before submitting
Note: Not applicable—this change addresses a direct documentation inconsistency found during review, with no prior discussion needed.
Update made: Modified the Simplified Chinese README’s descriptive text to include "函数库".
Note: Not applicable—this is a documentation-only change that does not impact code logic or functionality.
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@stevhliu
(Per the template guidelines, tagged the documentation-focused reviewer for Chinese docs accuracy checks.)