-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
feat(ci): added --min-instances to Backend CI. #459
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@hwakabh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 21 minutes and 26 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the GitHub Actions workflow for the backend CI process by adding a new parameter, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/backend.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/backend.yaml (1)
66-66: Implementation looks good!
The --min-instances=3 flag is correctly implemented using the flags parameter of the deploy-cloudrun action. This will ensure the service maintains at least 3 instances for improved availability.
| with: | ||
| image: 'us-central1-docker.pkg.dev/hwakabh-dev/gh-pages/api:latest' | ||
| service: 'gh-pages-api-server' | ||
| flags: '--min-instances=3' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Document min-instances configuration and consider environment-specific settings
Based on the verification, there's no existing documentation about instance configuration, and the min-instances=3 setting is hardcoded in the backend workflow without any environment distinction. The original review comment's concerns are valid:
- No documentation exists explaining the rationale for 3 instances
- No environment-specific configurations (same setting used for all deployments)
- No visible cost monitoring or scaling event alerts setup
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider documenting instance count rationale and cost implications
While setting min-instances=3 improves availability, consider:
- Document the reasoning for choosing 3 instances (e.g., in README or deployment docs)
- Monitor costs as min-instances will keep these containers running even during low traffic
- Consider implementing different instance counts for different environments (staging vs prod)
- Set up alerts for unusual scaling events or high costs
Let's check if there's any existing documentation about instance counts:
Let me check if there are any configuration files or deployment manifests that might contain instance-related settings:
Let me try one final search to check for any Cloud Run or deployment-related configurations:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any existing documentation about instance configuration
rg -i "instances|scaling|replicas" README.md docs/ 2>/dev/null || echo "No matching documentation found"
# Check if there are different workflow files for different environments
fd -g "*backend*.ya?ml" .github/workflows/
Length of output: 170
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for kubernetes manifests or cloud deployment configs
fd -e yaml -e yml -e json . | grep -i "deploy\|config"
# Search for instance/scaling related configuration in yaml/json files
rg -i "instances:|replicas:|scaling" -g "*.{yaml,yml,json}" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 128
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for Cloud Run configurations in workflow files
rg -i "cloud-run|gcloud run" .github/workflows/ -A 5 -B 5
# Search for any comments or documentation about instances in workflow files
rg -i "min-instances|max-instances|scaling" .github/workflows/ -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 643
13c8a21 to
aa1fbd0
Compare
Issue/PR link
closes: #454
What does this PR do?
Describe what changes you make in your branch:
--min-instancesoptions withwith.flagsfields in GitHub Actions(Optional) Additional Contexts
Describe additional information for reviewers (i.e. What does not included)
mainto confirm changes would be appliedSummary by CodeRabbit