Skip to content

Conversation

@OriolMunoz-da
Copy link
Contributor

@OriolMunoz-da OriolMunoz-da commented Jun 17, 2025

Fixes #479

Decided NOT to use the canton version and instead kept the existing cache, I don't see any reason why we'd replace it.

[ci]

Signed-off-by: Oriol Muñoz <oriol.munoz@digitalasset.com>
@OriolMunoz-da OriolMunoz-da marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2025 13:04
@OriolMunoz-da
Copy link
Contributor Author

Should this be mentioned in release notes?

@moritzkiefer-da
Copy link
Contributor

Should this be mentioned in release notes?

yes

Copy link
Contributor

@moritzkiefer-da moritzkiefer-da left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice thanks! Should we propagate that through the helm charts and document it? We should definitely add a release notes entry.

Signed-off-by: Oriol Muñoz <oriol.munoz@digitalasset.com>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Muñoz <oriol.munoz@digitalasset.com>
@OriolMunoz-da
Copy link
Contributor Author

@moritzkiefer-da re-requesting for you to check the helm stuff, cause i shouldn't be trusted

- id: rstcheck
name: Check sphinx format
additional_dependencies: ['rstcheck[sphinx]']
args: [--report-level, WARNING]
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

image

Signed-off-by: Oriol Muñoz <oriol.munoz@digitalasset.com>
Signed-off-by: Oriol Muñoz <oriol.munoz@digitalasset.com>
@OriolMunoz-da OriolMunoz-da merged commit 2100cb1 into main Jun 18, 2025
60 checks passed
@OriolMunoz-da OriolMunoz-da deleted the oriol/jwks-timeout branch June 18, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make JWKS connection timeouts configurable

3 participants