Skip to content

Conversation

@saxenakshitiz
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #85 (6db6bbd) into main (45ba123) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 75.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main      #85      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     83.48%   83.46%   -0.03%     
  Complexity      316      316              
============================================
  Files            38       38              
  Lines          1574     1578       +4     
  Branches         50       51       +1     
============================================
+ Hits           1314     1317       +3     
  Misses          223      223              
- Partials         37       38       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 83.46% <75.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
unit 82.64% <75.00%> (-0.03%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...service/LabelApplicationRuleConfigServiceImpl.java 92.30% <75.00%> (-0.80%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 45ba123...6db6bbd. Read the comment docs.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

mongo:
host: mongo
url: ""
maxDynamicLabelApplicationRulesPerTenant: 100
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now where is this defined in configmap then ?

@saxenakshitiz saxenakshitiz merged commit f594094 into main Dec 3, 2021
@saxenakshitiz saxenakshitiz deleted the max_label_appl_rules_config branch December 3, 2021 07:17
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 3, 2021

Unit Test Results

21 files  ±0  21 suites  ±0   39s ⏱️ -1s
82 tests ±0  82 ✔️ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit f594094. ± Comparison against base commit 45ba123.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants