Add attachments to problems #226
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
deboer-tim
reviewed
Sep 12, 2025
Co-authored-by: Jaap Eldering <eldering@users.noreply.github.com>
niemela
previously approved these changes
Sep 15, 2025
I think so, yes.
I think we should, yes. |
Let's see what the others think during our call and then I'll add it. |
eldering
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2025
niemela
approved these changes
Sep 29, 2025
deboer-tim
added a commit
to deboer-tim/icpctools
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2025
Add attachments to problems as per icpc/ccs-specs#226.
deboer-tim
added a commit
to icpctools/icpctools
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2025
Add attachments to problems as per icpc/ccs-specs#226.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #220
Question: do we want to add this to the CCS system requirements access endpoint? We didn't do this for
statement, should we have?