Improve by-path symlink issue description slightly #2179
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Eero Tamminen <eero.t.tamminen@intel.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Btw. CI tests could be improved a bit. If I'm changing just documentation, all the code tests could be skipped. |
Merged
Contributor
Github understands skip ci. our READMEs are scattered all over the place so maintaining path filters for trigger events is not easy |
Contributor
|
At some point, we had a check for PRs with only *.md files that then ignored all the builds/tests. The downside was that the PR wasn't deemed "good" by GitHubt because some of the "required checks" were not completed. Another somewhat silly downside was that our scorecard score decreased slightly because "only 9 of the past 10 PRs went through CI". |
tkatila
approved these changes
Dec 5, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As suggested in #2178 (comment).