-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
Closed
Description
I have a performance regression for some of the benchmarks between commits c3ef058 and ebb5646.
When running benchmarks between two processes on the same node but on different sockets, like this:
mpiexec_mpt -ppn 2 -n 2 omplace -nt 32 ./IMB-MPI1 biband -npmin 2
I get this performance for the old source code:
# Benchmarking Biband
# #processes = 2
#---------------------------------------------------
#bytes #repetitions Mbytes/sec Msg/sec
0 1000 0.00 4988798
1 1000 6.37 6373589
2 1000 13.62 6810416
4 1000 25.55 6388573
8 1000 50.81 6351491
16 1000 101.49 6342847
32 1000 203.61 6362683
64 1000 378.28 5910609
128 1000 293.17 2290367
256 1000 624.56 2439692
512 1000 1212.22 2367611
1024 1000 2078.85 2030125
2048 1000 8515.61 4158012
4096 1000 15032.28 3669991
8192 1000 25693.00 3136352
16384 1000 25555.42 1559779
32768 1000 25122.75 766685
65536 640 34725.89 529875
131072 320 31540.43 240634
262144 160 18311.99 69855
524288 80 15432.22 29435
1048576 40 14296.57 13634
2097152 20 14836.32 7075
4194304 10 14914.15 3556
And this performance for the newer version of IMB:
#---------------------------------------------------
# Benchmarking Biband
# #processes = 2
#---------------------------------------------------
#bytes #repetitions Mbytes/sec Msg/sec
0 1000 0.00 5147985
1 1000 6.29 6290787
2 1000 14.39 7193543
4 1000 26.45 6613563
8 1000 53.03 6629307
16 1000 102.32 6395217
32 1000 207.49 6483996
64 1000 440.25 6878981
128 1000 312.46 2441079
256 1000 608.54 2377097
512 1000 1200.30 2344330
1024 1000 1927.01 1881845
2048 1000 8097.04 3953630
4096 1000 4591.55 1120983
8192 1000 5532.52 675356
16384 1000 5822.15 355356
32768 1000 5488.27 167489
65536 640 5508.57 84054
131072 320 4271.12 32586
262144 160 4208.83 16055
524288 80 4139.70 7896
1048576 40 4085.87 3897
2097152 20 4054.54 1933
4194304 10 4042.60 964
I'm using the same compilers between both source codes and the network setup isn't changed.
Is this expected with the latest IMB?
thanks
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels