Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
Upgrading to h3
^2.0.1-rc.5introduces risk due to several factors:Before merging, confirm:
Run the following to verify h3 v2 compatibility and test status:
Additionally, search the web for breaking changes between h3 v1 and v2:
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 191
🌐 Web query:
💡 Result:
Here are the main breaking changes when moving H3 v1 → v2 (summary — see migration guide for full details):
Sources: H3 migration guide and v2 beta announcement. [1][2]
References
[1] H3 migration guide (v1→v2). h3.dev/migration.
[2] H3 v2 beta announcement / blog. h3.dev/blog/v2-beta.
I need to search the codebase properly to understand actual h3 API usage and verify test status.
I need to examine the codebase to verify whether h3 APIs are actually used and whether tests pass with the RC version.
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 945
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 102
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 3631
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 2739
Verify h3 v2.0.1-rc.5 compatibility before merging — confirmed breaking changes require testing.
Investigation confirms significant breaking changes in h3 v1→v2: ESM-only/Node >= 20.11 requirement, web-standards rewrite using Request/Response/URL/Headers, router API changes, middleware path matching changes, and event.path semantics changes.
Your code directly imports and uses affected h3 APIs:
toWebRequest()from h3H3Eventtype (test mocks assume specific structure withweb.requestandnode.req)AppOptionstypeh3Tests exist (
index.test.ts,spec/integration.spec.ts,spec/e2e.spec.ts) and the rootpnpm testscript will run them via vitest. However, before merging to a pre-release version:pnpm testand verify all h3 package tests pass with h3 v2.0.1-rc.5H3Eventstructure,toWebRequest(), andAppOptionsmatch v2 API in your code