Skip to content

Conversation

@jwendell
Copy link
Member

@jwendell jwendell commented Aug 4, 2020

Closes #24068.

@jwendell jwendell added release-notes-none Indicates a PR that does not require release notes. cherrypick/release-1.7 labels Aug 4, 2020
@jwendell jwendell requested a review from a team as a code owner August 4, 2020 20:44
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Set by the Google CLA bot to indicate the author of a PR has signed the Google CLA. label Aug 4, 2020
@istio-policy-bot
Copy link

🤔 🐛 You appear to be fixing a bug in Go code, yet your PR doesn't include updates to any test files. Did you forget to add a test?

Courtesy of your friendly test nag.

@istio-testing istio-testing added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this still correct without passing any param?
I'm getting this with latest master code base.

$ go run "${GOPATH}"/src/istio.io/istio/istioctl/cmd/istioctl/main.go verify-install                                                     

Error: could not load IstioOperator from cluster: control plane revision "" not found.  Use --filename
exit status 1

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I'm getting the same. That's what motivated this PR. The description is outdated.
See #24068 (comment) and #23087 (comment)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I see. Can we clarify the msg? Via Istio operator, does it mean server side operator or istioctl? Do we need to specify istio operator here?

@linsun
Copy link
Member

linsun commented Aug 4, 2020

cc @irisdingbj

@jwendell
Copy link
Member Author

jwendell commented Aug 5, 2020

cc @esnible

ericvn
ericvn previously requested changes Aug 5, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@ericvn ericvn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe we should probably release note the removal of function.

@jwendell
Copy link
Member Author

jwendell commented Aug 5, 2020

It changed in 1.6 :/

@ericvn ericvn dismissed their stale review August 6, 2020 00:15

I didn't find anything in the doc that really discussed this outside the reference docs. This also was removed in 1.6, so not sure if it's appropriate to add a release note in 1.7.

@irisdingbj
Copy link
Member

irisdingbj commented Aug 6, 2020

lgtm

Yep, behaviour changed for this command in 1.6 so I will agree for this pr. But I want @esnible to confirm as he made this changes.

@istio-testing
Copy link
Collaborator

In response to a cherrypick label: new pull request created: #26359

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla: yes Set by the Google CLA bot to indicate the author of a PR has signed the Google CLA. release-notes-none Indicates a PR that does not require release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

'istioctl verify-install' no longer does precheck

8 participants