Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 4, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@hiento09
Copy link
Contributor

@hiento09 hiento09 commented Oct 30, 2024

Describe Your Changes

  • Add e2e test cortexso model hub

Fixes Issues

Self Checklist

  • Added relevant comments, esp in complex areas
  • Updated docs (for bug fixes / features)
  • Created issues for follow-up changes or refactoring needed

@hiento09 hiento09 force-pushed the feat/e2e-test-cortexso-hub branch 4 times, most recently from bfd5d49 to d080b4a Compare October 31, 2024 05:12
@hiento09 hiento09 force-pushed the feat/e2e-test-cortexso-hub branch from d080b4a to 98ade84 Compare October 31, 2024 05:33
@hiento09 hiento09 self-assigned this Oct 31, 2024
@hiento09 hiento09 requested a review from a team October 31, 2024 05:36
@hiento09 hiento09 marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2024 05:36
Copy link
Contributor

@dan-menlo dan-menlo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hiento09 I think it is better for us to test the default model (need to check with @gabrielle-ong @namchuai on what the label is). I think in some cases, it is not the gguf tag.

See the "default" below

image

@hiento09
Copy link
Contributor Author

@hiento09 I think it is better for us to test the default model (need to check with @gabrielle-ong @namchuai on what the label is). I think in some cases, it is not the gguf tag.

See the "default" below

image

I totally agree, @dan-homebrew

@hiento09 hiento09 requested a review from dan-menlo October 31, 2024 08:47
@hiento09 hiento09 removed the request for review from dan-menlo November 1, 2024 06:33
@hiento09 hiento09 merged commit 11cd87b into dev Nov 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@hiento09 hiento09 deleted the feat/e2e-test-cortexso-hub branch November 1, 2024 06:33
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants