Skip to content

Conversation

jtnord
Copy link
Member

@jtnord jtnord commented Aug 11, 2025

As an API plugin with no other dependencies we should not be bumping the version and releasing. if a dependabot update for the version works then it can be closed.

per https://www.jenkins.io/doc/developer/plugin-development/choosing-jenkins-baseline/

If you are packaging a pure API library (one that does not depend on Jenkins APIs) then you should ignore newer Jenkins versions and pick an older LTS

just pick a .1 and stick with it.

Testing done

Submitter checklist

  • Make sure you are opening from a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side) and not your main branch!
  • Ensure that the pull request title represents the desired changelog entry
  • Please describe what you did
  • Link to relevant issues in GitHub or Jira
  • Link to relevant pull requests, esp. upstream and downstream changes
  • Ensure you have provided tests that demonstrate the feature works or the issue is fixed

As an API plugin with no other dependencies we should not be bumping the version and releasing.
if a dependabot update for the version works then it can be closed.
@jtnord jtnord requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2025 17:31
@jtnord jtnord mentioned this pull request Aug 11, 2025
6 tasks
@jtnord
Copy link
Member Author

jtnord commented Sep 1, 2025

@jonesbusy could you take a look, TIA.

@jonesbusy jonesbusy added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file developer Changes which impact plugin developers labels Sep 2, 2025
@jonesbusy jonesbusy changed the title downgrade Jenkins downgrade Jenkins to 2.492.1 Sep 2, 2025
@jonesbusy jonesbusy merged commit 596efb9 into jenkinsci:main Sep 2, 2025
17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file developer Changes which impact plugin developers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants