Skip to content

Conversation

@lambdalisue
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

The benchmark result of the previous implementation is 197.12 ns/iter
but the new implementation is 88.99 ns/iter.
Before to this commit, the benchmark result was

  is.ObjectOf                   335.74 ns/iter   2,978,453.8 (307.15 ns … 694.14 ns) 337.23 ns 391.01 ns 694.14 ns
  is.ObjectOf (strict)          406.31 ns/iter   2,461,182.4  (386.4 ns … 453.27 ns) 413.72 ns 442.96 ns 453.27 ns
  is.ObjectOf (pre)             179.34 ns/iter   5,575,896.2   (167.5 ns … 196.1 ns) 185.86 ns 195.85 ns 195.88 ns
  is.ObjectOf (pre, strict)     205.37 ns/iter   4,869,263.2 (199.38 ns … 225.96 ns) 207.86 ns 224.33 ns 225.62 ns

And after this commit

  is.ObjectOf                   150.21 ns/iter   6,657,313.1 (144.75 ns … 161.07 ns) 152.62 ns 159.53 ns 160.82 ns
  is.ObjectOf (strict)          240.33 ns/iter   4,160,893.5 (233.04 ns … 276.14 ns) 241.96 ns 273.35 ns 273.55 ns
  is.ObjectOf (pre)              112.1 ns/iter   8,920,598.1 (108.72 ns … 124.09 ns) 112.92 ns 118.22 ns 122.38 ns
  is.ObjectOf (pre, strict)     137.05 ns/iter   7,296,588.7 (130.81 ns … 168.84 ns) 139.82 ns 151.59 ns 158.23 ns
Before this commit, the benchmark result was

  is.OptionalOf                 243.37 ns/iter   4,108,906.6  (234.5 ns … 271.25 ns) 245.73 ns 264.14 ns 267.17 ns
  is.OptionalOf (pre)           200.66 ns/iter   4,983,517.6 (195.82 ns … 232.95 ns) 202.55 ns 215.28 ns 222.94 ns

And after this commit

  is.OptionalOf                  45.56 ns/iter  21,948,235.7   (41.91 ns … 72.25 ns)  48.58 ns  53.75 ns  56.55 ns
  is.OptionalOf (pre)            12.86 ns/iter  77,733,516.2    (12.7 ns … 20.59 ns)  12.86 ns  14.23 ns  14.64 ns
@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 2e392ad into main Aug 26, 2023
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the improve-performance branch August 26, 2023 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants