Skip to content

Conversation

@lambdalisue
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue commented Nov 26, 2023

SSIA

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new isUnknown check to enhance type validation capabilities.
  • Tests

    • Added test cases for the new isUnknown function to ensure reliability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2023

Walkthrough

The update introduces a new function isUnknown which, paradoxically, returns true for any input, suggesting that every type is unknown. This function is added to the is.ts module and is accompanied by a test case in is_test.ts to ensure its functionality. The change seems to be a whimsical or philosophical take on type checking, as it defies the typical purpose of type validation functions.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
is.ts, is_test.ts Added a new function isUnknown that returns true for any input, along with its test case.

🐇✨
To the land of code, a new function springs,
isUnknown, a jest it brings.
For every type, it nods with glee,
"A mystery you are!" it decrees. 🎩🐰
✨🐇


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit 6cdf1e3 into main Nov 26, 2023
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the add-is-unknown branch November 26, 2023 12:27
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8f8d181 and aec15fc.
Files selected for processing (2)
  • is.ts (2 hunks)
  • is_test.ts (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
is.ts (1)
  • 515-521:
    If the implementation of isUnknown is not corrected, its utility when exported should be reconsidered, as it may not provide meaningful functionality.
is_test.ts (1)
  • 36-42:
    The export list correctly includes the new isUnknown function.

Comment on lines +139 to +157
Deno.test("isUnknown", async (t) => {
await testWithExamples(t, isUnknown, {
validExamples: [
"string",
"number",
"bigint",
"boolean",
"array",
"record",
"syncFunction",
"asyncFunction",
"null",
"undefined",
"symbol",
"date",
"promise",
],
});
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test case for isUnknown is incorrectly expecting true for all known types, which contradicts the intended functionality of the function. The test should be set up to expect false for known types and true for unknown types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants