-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
📝 Improve documentation #45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe project has been updated with significant changes across various files. The workflow automation and code coverage tracking have been enhanced, including refined GitHub Actions workflows, coverage report generation, and task improvements in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit's AI:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once merged to your default branch, Codecov will compare your coverage reports and display the results in this comment. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/npm.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (3 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- deno.jsonc (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/npm.yml
- .gitignore
Additional comments: 10
deno.jsonc (6)
5-5: The
testtask now includes additional options like--paralleland--shuffle. These options are beneficial for improving test robustness and efficiency.6-6: The
test:coveragetask is a new addition and correctly specifies the coverage directory. Ensure that the.coveragedirectory is properly set up in the CI environment and is ignored by version control.7-7: The
checktask has been simplified to check all TypeScript files. This change assumes that all TypeScript files need to be checked, which is generally a good practice.8-8: The
coveragetask is new and excludes a specific file from coverage. Verify thatis_bench.tsis the only file that should be excluded from coverage reports.9-9: The
upgradetask uses a specific version of themolttool. Confirm that this version is compatible with the project's requirements and that using a fixed version aligns with the project's dependency management strategy.10-10: The
upgrade:committask includes a commit step with a specific prefix and pre-commit formatting. Ensure that this task is integrated into the workflow in a way that does not disrupt development processes or cause unintended commits..github/workflows/test.yml (4)
19-19: The checkout action has been updated to version 4. This is a routine update and should be checked for compatibility with the rest of the workflow.
40-40: A new step has been added to run the
test:coveragetask. Ensure that this step is correctly configured to generate coverage reports as intended.43-47: The coverage report is being generated and uploaded using the
codecov-action. Verify that thecoverage.lcovfile is correctly produced and that the Codecov integration is properly configured.68-68: The Node setup action has been updated to version 4 and includes the npm registry URL. This change should be verified for compatibility with the project's Node.js usage.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (6)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- README.md (6 hunks)
- deno.jsonc (1 hunks)
- is.ts (8 hunks)
- mod.ts (1 hunks)
- util.ts (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- README.md
- is.ts
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .gitignore
Additional comments: 13
deno.jsonc (7)
3-5: The
importssection has been updated to use a dynamic version placeholder for the module path. This is a good practice for maintaining version consistency across imports.8-8: The
testtask has been updated with flags that could potentially change the behavior of the tests. Ensure that the existing tests are compatible with these new flags.9-9: A new
test:coveragetask has been added to generate coverage reports. This is a valuable addition for tracking test coverage.10-10: The
checktask has been simplified. Verify that the simplified command covers all necessary files and does not skip any that were previously checked.11-11: The
coveragetask is designed to exclude a specific file from coverage reports. Confirm that this exclusion is intentional and that the file does not contain code that should be covered by tests.Verification successful
The
is_bench.tsfile contains benchmark tests, which are used to measure the performance of code. It is common practice to exclude benchmark files from test coverage reports, as coverage is typically focused on the correctness of the code rather than its performance. Therefore, the exclusion ofis_bench.tsfrom the coverage report in thecoveragetask is intentional and appropriate.* 12-12: The `upgrade` task has been completely reworked. Ensure that the new upgrade command works as expected and that the specified version of the `molt` tool is compatible with the project.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the excluded file should not be part of coverage cat ./is_bench.tsLength of output: 5923
- 13-13: The
upgrade:committask has been added with specific flags. Verify that the flags used in the task are valid and that the task behaves as intended.util.ts (4)
48-48: The example provided in the documentation uses a dynamic module version placeholder. This is a good practice for ensuring that examples in the documentation remain up-to-date with the current module version.
71-71: The import statement has been updated to use the dynamic module version placeholder. This change should be verified to ensure that the correct version of the module is being used throughout the codebase.
Verification successful
The search results indicate that the dynamic module version placeholder
$MODULE_VERSIONis consistently used in import statements fromunknownutilacross various TypeScript files in the codebase (util.ts,mod.ts, andis.ts). This consistency suggests that the correct version of the module is intended to be used throughout the codebase, as per the dynamic placeholder.Based on the provided output, the review comment about verifying the use of the dynamic module version placeholder has been addressed, and the placeholder is indeed being used correctly across the codebase.
* 100-100: The import statement in the example for the `ensure` function has been updated to use the dynamic module version placeholder. This change should be verified to ensure that the correct version of the module is being used throughout the codebase.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the correct version of the module is being used rg --type ts "https://deno.land/x/unknownutil@\$MODULE_VERSION/mod.ts"Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any import statements from 'unknownutil' to check for hardcoded versions rg --type ts "https://deno.land/x/unknownutil@"Length of output: 1522
- 125-125: The import statement in the example for the
maybefunction has been updated to use the dynamic module version placeholder. This change should be verified to ensure that the correct version of the module is being used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
The search results indicate that the dynamic module version placeholder
$MODULE_VERSIONis consistently used in the import statements fromdeno.land/x/unknownutilacross various files in the codebase. This confirms that the import statement for themaybefunction, as well as other related import statements, have been updated to use the dynamic module version placeholder correctly.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the correct version of the module is being used rg --type ts "https://deno.land/x/unknownutil@\$MODULE_VERSION/mod.ts"Length of output: 71
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any import statements from 'deno.land/x/unknownutil' to check for hardcoded versions rg --type ts "https://deno.land/x/unknownutil"Length of output: 1521
mod.ts (2)
1-131: The documentation comments provide a comprehensive overview of the utility pack and its usage. The examples are updated to use the dynamic module version placeholder, which is a good practice. Ensure that the documentation is clear and that the examples work as intended.
131-131: The file exports modules for type predicate functions (
is) and helper functions (assert,ensure,maybe). Ensure that these exports are working as expected and that there are no missing or extraneous exports.Verification successful
To verify the exports in
mod.ts, I will usergto search for export statements within the file. This will help confirm if the modules for type predicate functions (is) and helper functions (assert,ensure,maybe) are indeed being exported.
The output from the
rgcommand shows thatmod.tscontains the following export statements:
export * from "./is.ts";export * from "./util.ts";export { is };This confirms that the modules for type predicate functions (
is) are being exported. However, the helper functions (assert,ensure,maybe) are not explicitly mentioned in the output. Sinceexport * from "./util.ts";is present, it's possible that these helper functions are part of theutil.tsmodule.To verify that the helper functions are indeed part of the
util.tsmodule and are being exported, I will need to inspect the contents ofutil.ts.
The output from the
rgcommand confirms that theutil.tsmodule contains and exports the following helper functions:
export function assert<T>(export function ensure<T>(export function maybe<T>(Given this information, we can conclude that the
mod.tsfile correctly exports the modules for type predicate functions (is) and the helper functions (assert,ensure,maybe) as expected.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the exports are correct and working as expected deno info mod.tsLength of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for export statements in mod.ts rg "export" mod.tsLength of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the helper functions in util.ts rg "function (assert|ensure|maybe)" util.tsLength of output: 125
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
.gitignoreto exclude coverage directories.Documentation