Skip to content

Conversation

odow
Copy link
Member

@odow odow commented Oct 7, 2025

Basic

  • version field of Project.toml has been updated
    - If a breaking change, increment the MAJOR field and reset others to 0
    - If adding new features, increment the MINOR field and reset PATCH to 0
    - If adding bug fixes or documentation changes, increment the PATCH field

Documentation

  • Add a new entry to docs/src/changelog.md, following existing style

Tests

@odow
Copy link
Member Author

odow commented Oct 8, 2025

The Juniper and Pavito failures are super interesting and they are caused by #2857

  • They have z --> {f(x) in S}, z in {0, 1}
  • They have an outer solver that covers z in {0, 1}. They pass z --> {f(x) in S}, z == a to the inner solver. The inner solver says, sure, I know how to reformulate --> assuming z is binary. But z is fixed and isn't {0, 1}. The reformulation is still valid though, which is why the tests were passing before.

Maybe we should revert #2857 and add a check at the JuMP level?

Or maybe the bridge needs to say: I added a ZeroOne constraint even though I didn't just so we validate that an indicator can't be bridged by a continuous solver.

Or maybe we need to convert the error() AddConstraintNotAllowed.

@odow
Copy link
Member Author

odow commented Oct 9, 2025

@odow
Copy link
Member Author

odow commented Oct 9, 2025

@odow odow requested a review from blegat October 9, 2025 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant