-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
Docker README Fixes #554
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Docker README Fixes #554
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It should be rephrased to make clear that the data volume will be created internally and persist(!) if not overridden like in the example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you mean persist here? Using
--rm
means the container will be cleaned up on exit.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
your example may be well for demonstration purposes. but it's hardly useful for daily usage.
my point is: this is a documentation of the Docker image. that image includes a volume declaration. for non-demonstration-usages it is essential to mention this volume explicitly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in the case of the example this is not true and a contradiction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I respectfully disagree. There are quite a few dependencies required by
jupyter
. Getting a nice working copy can sometimes be tricky. Being able to startup adocker
container instead of debugging the build/install process is a huge asset. Not having to understand all of the ends and outs ofdocker
in order to getjupyter
up and running makes this worthwhile for the average end user.If your point here is that
docker
is normally used on cluster deployments and the like, then I think that user will know enough aboutdocker
that they will have no problem changing these options to fit their needs.Which it now is.
Not true. They are saved in that directory. While the container is up and running one could still find these using
docker exec
. The container is merely blown away on exit instead of merely being stopped.I have tried to add a line to address the concern you have raised. If you think I have not done so, please be explicit about what you would like to see instead. I would like this to be resolved in a manner that we can both find satisfactory soon.