Add tests that kube types added as CRDs show the expected columns

[ncdc]

We have custom code that makes sure that when CRDs are added for built-in kube types (deployments, services, pods, etc.), kubectl get <resource> returns the same columns as the user expects, by replacing the CRD table converter with the go code for the printers for the internal built-in types. We should add tests that ensure we don't regress.

Example - deployments - if we regress:

NAME    AGE
kuard   104m

This is what's expected:

NAME    READY   UP-TO-DATE   AVAILABLE   AGE
kuard   0/1     1            0           3s

These can be both API and CLI tests.

cc @kasturinarra

[kasturinarra]

ACK & we will add these tests, thanks !!

[kasturinarra]

Added a test case in polarion and here is the link for the same https://polarion.engineering.redhat.com/polarion/#/project/OSE/workitem?id=OCP-50878

[kasturinarra]

@ncdc one question for the API tests would you want me to test the CRD additionalPrinterColumns ??

oc get crd catalogsources.operators.coreos.com -o yaml
...

• additionalPrinterColumns:
  • description: The pretty name of the catalog
    jsonPath: .spec.displayName
    name: Display
    type: string
  • description: The type of the catalog
    jsonPath: .spec.sourceType
    name: Type
    type: string
  • description: The publisher of the catalog
    jsonPath: .spec.publisher
    name: Publisher
    type: string
  • jsonPath: .metadata.creationTimestamp
    name: Age
    type: date

[ncdc]

It's fine to test them, but it's not related to this code/issue

[kasturinarra]

It's fine to test them, but it's not related to this code/issue

okay, i have added CLI test in polarion to ensure we get all the right columns , but how do we cover the api test ?

[ncdc]

For all built in Kubernetes types that someone could import as a CRD, verify that kubectl get output between kcp & kube matches.

[kasturinarra]

For all built in Kubernetes types that someone could import as a CRD, verify that kubectl get output between kcp & kube matches.

ah, okay, thanks !!