Only show interactive options and infos when enabled and used (AI imp…

[ClaudioWayne]

…rovements)

• Show interactive and manual check boxes depending on whether they are configured on submit page
• Display remote session information on the task status website only if it has been configured and activated.
• Disable Manual checkbox on submit page when interactive checkbox is unchecked
• AI improvements included

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ClaudioWayne, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the user interface and backend logic for task submission and status viewing. It introduces conditional rendering of interactive options on the submission page, ensuring that users only see and interact with features that are actively configured. Additionally, it refines the display of remote session details on the task status page, making the information more relevant and reducing visual clutter. The changes aim to streamline the user experience by presenting options and information contextually.

Highlights

• Conditional UI for Submission Options: Interactive desktop and manual detonation checkboxes on the submission page are now only displayed if the interactive desktop feature is enabled in the configuration.
• Dynamic Manual Detonation Control: The "Manual detonation" checkbox is now dynamically disabled and unchecked if the "Interactive desktop" checkbox is not selected, improving user interaction.
• Refined Remote Session Display: Remote session information on the task status page is now only shown if the Guacamole integration is enabled and the task was submitted with the interactive option.
• AI Improvements: The pull request description mentions "AI improvements," indicating broader enhancements beyond the UI changes.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces several UI/UX improvements related to interactive analysis sessions. It conditionally displays interactive options on the submission page based on configuration, adds logic to enable/disable the 'manual detonation' checkbox based on the 'interactive desktop' selection, and ensures remote session information is only shown on the task status page when an interactive session is active. The changes are well-implemented and align with the PR's goals. I've added one minor comment regarding HTML formatting for better code consistency.

[gemini-code-assist]

The indentation for the inner div of the progress bar is excessive, which harms code readability. It's a good practice to maintain consistent indentation.

        <div class="progress progress-striped active" style="margin-top: 10px;">
            <div class="progress-bar progress-bar-striped progress-bar-animated" style="width:100%"></div>
        </div>

[doomedraven]

AI doesn't complain about AI code that's great. Thank you