feat: add information component in home #15
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request introduce a new Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/common/footer.tsx (1)
17-17: Remove unnecessary z-index from grid container.The
z-50class seems unnecessary for the footer grid as there's no apparent z-index stacking context requirement. Consider removing it to maintain cleaner CSS.- <div className='grid grid-cols-1 sm:grid-cols-4 md:grid-cols-4 xl:grid-cols-6 gap-x-12 gap-y-8 z-50'> + <div className='grid grid-cols-1 sm:grid-cols-4 md:grid-cols-4 xl:grid-cols-6 gap-x-12 gap-y-8'>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- src/components/common/footer.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/sections/information.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/data/index.ts (1 hunks)
- src/pages/index.tsx (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/pages/index.tsx (2)
12-12: LGTM! Import statement follows established patterns.The import statement is properly organized with other section components and follows the project's import conventions.
84-84: Verify the Information component placement and configuration.The component placement between Hero and FAQ sections seems logical, but please verify:
- The content flow makes sense from a user experience perspective
- Whether the component requires any props for configuration
Let's check the Information component implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the Information component implementation.
This should help us locate and analyze the Information component's implementation, including any prop definitions and its placement in the codebase.
Information component integration is correctly implemented
Based on the verification results, the Information component:
- Is correctly defined as a self-contained component that doesn't require any props
- Contains a complete documentation section with features grid
- Has proper positioning between Hero and FAQ sections, creating a logical content flow:
- Hero (introduction)
- Information (documentation details)
- FAQ (additional help)
The component is properly integrated and doesn't need any additional configuration through props as it's designed to be a standalone section.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Information component implementation and props # Check if Information component accepts any props ast-grep --pattern 'export function Information($$$) { $$$ }' # Look for any default props or prop type definitions rg -A 5 'Information.defaultProps|Information.propTypes'Length of output: 124
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for Information component definition with different export patterns ast-grep --pattern 'export const Information = $$$' # Search for Information component file fd -e tsx -e ts -e jsx -e js Information # Search for Information string in tsx/ts files to find its implementation rg -t typescript -t tsx "Information" -A 10Length of output: 3663
src/components/common/footer.tsx (1)
38-46: LGTM! Products section implementation is clean and consistent.The new Products section follows the established patterns:
- Maintains consistent styling with other footer sections
- Properly implements hover effects
- Uses correct key prop in the map function
- Follows the same semantic structure as other sections
src/components/sections/information.tsx (3)
1-4: LGTM! Imports are well-structured.The imports are clean and necessary for the component's functionality.
65-71: Verify Content Security Policy (CSP) compliance.Ensure that your CSP allows SVG icons from lucide-react to render properly. The Icon component should be tested with various CSP configurations.
44-82: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance component implementation for better UX and accessibility.
The component implementation could be improved in several areas:
- Optimize mobile layout:
-<div className='space-y-4 grid grid-cols-2'> +<div className='space-y-4 grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2'>
- Add semantic HTML and ARIA attributes:
-<div className='container px-4 md:px-6'> +<div className='container px-4 md:px-6' role="region" aria-labelledby="documentation-title"> <div className='gap-6'> <div className='space-y-4 grid grid-cols-2'> <div className='space-y-2 flex flex-col justify-center'> - <h2 className='text-3xl font-bold tracking-tighter sm:text-4xl md:text-5xl'> + <h2 id="documentation-title" className='text-3xl font-bold tracking-tighter sm:text-4xl md:text-5xl'>
- Consider memoizing the component to prevent unnecessary re-renders:
import { memo } from 'react' // ... component implementation export const Information = memo(InformationComponent)Let's verify the component's usage in the home page:
This is an automated pull request for branch develop
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Informationcomponent showcasing product features with icons.Informationcomponent into the homepage layout.Bug Fixes