You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@@ -77,11 +79,13 @@ Baer Chain was then classified as a Ponzi scheme by the Chinese government a few
77
79
78
80
Kleros Tokens registry was used at the time to curate tokens to be listed on the Ethfinex exchange in a decentralized manner. One of the famous examples of cases originating from this decentralized listing process is the listing of the Grid+ token. This token was rejected because the community estimated that, even if the project was legitimate, the rules required that the contracts should have been audited by a third party \(and Conensys Diligence was not considered a 3rd party as Grid+ was a Consensys-incubated startup\).
@@ -95,7 +99,7 @@ Towards the end of the experiment, the following image was submitted into the Do
95
99
96
100

97
101
98
-
The submitter claimed that this was the image of a cat and requested the 50 ETH reward. It wasthe opinion of Coopérative Kleros that the submitted image did not comply with the payout policy in the sense that it did not “clearly display” a cat as stated in the rules. Coopérative Kleros and the submitter have agreed to settle the dispute using the recently launched Kleros Escrow Dapp.
102
+
The submitter claimed that this was the image of a cat and requested the 50 ETH reward. It was ****the opinion of Coopérative Kleros that the submitted image did not comply with the payout policy in the sense that it did not “clearly display” a cat as stated in the rules. Coopérative Kleros and the submitter agreed to settle the dispute using the recently launched Kleros Escrow Dapp and the payment was rejected in the end.
99
103
100
104
Learn more about this case: [https://blog.kleros.io/kleros-vs-cat-in-the-snow-the-escrow-leading-case/](https://blog.kleros.io/kleros-vs-cat-in-the-snow-the-escrow-leading-case/)
0 commit comments