Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 99.11% 99.15% +0.04%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 338 355 +17
==========================================
+ Hits 335 352 +17
Misses 3 3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
rcannood
approved these changes
Sep 2, 2021
Collaborator
rcannood
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Brilliant! おつかれさまでした!
I added one more commit which renames 'nan' to 'use_nan' to avoid naming conflicts between the parameter 'nan' and the function 'std::nan', just in case.
Owner
Author
|
@rcannood thank you for reviewing. I will update CRAN soon. |
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add
use_nanargument for #20.simil(method = "correlation", use_nan = TRUE)will returnNaNfor vectors without variance.I am happy to change the name of the argument if @rcannood can has a better idea.