-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 948
fix(api): allow atomic RuntimePatches update on unsuspend #3469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
NarayanaSabari
wants to merge
9
commits into
kubeflow:master
Choose a base branch
from
NarayanaSabari:fix/runtime-patches-atomic-unsuspend
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+264
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4b342fb
fix(webhook): allow atomic RuntimePatches update on unsuspend
NarayanaSabari 3828c4c
test(jobset): cover atomic suspend->unsuspend RuntimePatches update
NarayanaSabari 838ec92
test(integration): cover atomic unsuspend + RuntimePatches update
NarayanaSabari d067b6e
fix(api): block RuntimePatches change only when both states are unsus…
NarayanaSabari dbb9ba4
test: cover unsuspended->suspended atomic RuntimePatches transition
NarayanaSabari bd7ffea
docs(api): shorten RuntimePatches validation comment
NarayanaSabari 946234f
fix(api): use stdlib for suspend pointer checks in jobset webhook
NarayanaSabari a3a2271
test(jobset): cover (false,true) transition with active jobSet
NarayanaSabari 6e11735
test(integration): drop atomic transition cases duplicated by UTs
NarayanaSabari File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you add one more scenario where old is not suspended, but new is suspended, and the JobSet is still active (
ReplicatedJobsStatus: []jobsetv1alpha2.ReplicatedJobStatus{ {Name: constants.Node, Active: 2}})?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added in a3a2271c as
"forbid atomic update: suspending trainJob with runtimePatches change is rejected when jobSet has an active replicatedJob". Fixture isoldSuspend=false,newSuspend=true, and a JobSet withReplicatedJobsStatus: [{Name: constants.Node, Active: 2}]— exactly the scenario you suggested. Verifies that the relaxed suspend predicate alone won't sneak a runtimePatches change past the activity safety net.